Abstract
While there was a flurry of articles throughout the 1990s in philosophy of education on Lyotard, there are still several key concepts in his oeuvre that have import for but remain largely underdeveloped or absent in the field. One of the most interesting of these absent concepts is Lyotard’s notion of the figural. In this paper, I take the figural as an educational problematic and ask what new educational insights it can generate in regard to the existing literature. As such, this article begins with a survey and synthesis of educational literature on Lyotard and the primary work on which most of it is based, exploring the relationship between knowledge, performativity, the differend, and “the system.” I then examine conceptions of education oriented toward defending the differend and disrupting the system and claim that, while helpful, these conceptions are limited in that they do not mention how educators and students might engage the alterity that the system seeks to repress. I believe that it is here that Lyotard’s notion of the figural can be productively engaged. The next section of the paper performs a partial and educationally partisan reading of Discourse, Figure. After this reading I move to formulate a figural education, which is composed of three educational processes and modes of engagement: reading, seeing, and blindness. A figural education, I argue, holds each of these practices in an uncertain and unsettling relation and, in so doing, can help educators defend the figural and the differend against the discursive demands of the system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Lyotard (1991) writes: “I do not like this haste. What it hurries, and crushes, is what after the fact I find I have always tried, under diverse headings—work, figural, heterogeneity, dissensus, event, thing—to reserve: the unharmonizable” (p. 4).
While Lyotard is concerned with the visual system, his observations could also be applied to the tactile system of Braille.
I would like to thank Katherine Vroman for helping me establish this particular connection.
References
Bennington, G. (1986). Lyotard: From discourse and figure to experimentation and event. Paragraph (Modern Critical Theory Group), 6, 19–27.
Debord, G., & Wolman, G. J. (1981). Methods of detournement. In K. Knabb (Ed. and Trans.), Situationist International Anthology. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (trans: by Hurley, R., Seem, M. & Lane, H.R.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Edwards, R. (2006). All quiet on the postmodern front? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(4), 273–278.
Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (trans: by Bennington, G. & Massumi, B.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, J-F. (1988). The differend: phrases in dispute (trans: by Van Den Abbeele, G.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, J-F. (1991). The inhuman:Reflections on time (trans: by Bennington, G. & Bowlby, R.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lyotard, J-F. (1997). Postmodern fables (trans: by Van Den Abbeele, G.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (2004). Anamnesis: Of the visible. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(1), 107–119.
Lyotard, J-F. (2011). Discourse, figure (trans: by Hudek, A., Lyndon, M. & Mowitt, J.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Mackler, S. (2004). Natality Seduced: Lyotard and the Birth of the Improbable. In K. Alston (Ed.), Philosophy of education yearbook 2003 (pp. 365–371). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.
Michalko, R. (2001). Blindness enters the classroom. Disability & Society, 16(3), 349–359.
Nuyen, A. T. (1996). Postmodern education as sublimation. Educational Theory, 46(1), 93–103.
Peters, M. A. (2006). Lyotard, nihilism and education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(4), 303–314.
Readings, B. (1991). Introducing Lyotard: Art and politics. London and New York: Routledge.
Readings, B. (1995). From emancipation to obligation: Sketch for a heteronomous politics of education. In M. Peters (Ed.), Education and the postmodern condition (pp. 193–207). Westport and London: Bergin & Garvey.
Slaughter, M. (2004). The arc and the zip: Deleuze and Lyotard on art. Law and Critique, 15(3), 231–257.
Usher, R. (2006). Lyotard’s performance. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(4), 279–288.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ford, D.R. A Figural Education with Lyotard. Stud Philos Educ 34, 89–100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9428-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9428-1