Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Two Theories of Just War

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As it is traditionally conceived, Just War Theory is not well suited for dealing with nation vs non-nation wars. It thus makes sense to create a second Just War Theory to deal with these wars. This article explores the differences and similarities between the two theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Rosalind Hursthouse, On Virtue Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. See especially Chapters 2 and 3.

  2. See especially chapters 5,6,8,9, and 11.

References

  • Balfour, S. (1990). Castro (pp. 36–63). London and New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., Steele, B., & Barney, R. (1995). Doing ethics in jouirnalism: A handbook with cse studies, 2nd ed. (p. 120) Boston, London, etc.: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceulemans, C. (2002). Just cause. In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion (Eds.), in Moral constraints on war (pp. 25–39). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesneaux, J., Le Barbier, F., & Bergere, M.–C. (1977). China: from the 1911 revolution to liberation. translated from the French by Paul Auter, Lydia Davis and Anne Destenaay. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Coppieters, B. (2002). Legitimate authority. In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion (Eds.), Moral constraints on war (pp. 41–58). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppieters, B., Apressyan, R., & Ceulemans, C. (2002). Last resort. In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion (Eds.), Moral constraints on war (pp. 101–121). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppieters, B., & Kashnikov, B. (2002). Right intentions. In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion (Eds.), Moral constraints on war (pp. 59–77). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotion, N. (2002). Proportionality. In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion (Eds.), Moral constraints on war (pp. 91–100). Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotion, N., & Coppieters, B. (2002). Likelihood of success. In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion (Eds.), Moral constraints on war (pp. 79–90). Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotion,N., Coppieters, B., & Apressyan, R. (2002). Introduction. In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion (Eds.), Moral constraints on war (pp. 1–22). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotion, N., & Tai, J. H. (2002, Winter-Spring) Applying just medical theory to medical research. Philosophical Inquiry, XXIV(1–2), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartle, A. (2002). Discrimination. In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion (Eds.), Moral constraints on war (pp. 141–158). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme G., & Fotion N. (2002). Proportionality (in bello). In B. Coppieters & N. Fotion, (Eds.), Moral constraints on war (pp. 129–140). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Fotion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fotion, N. Two Theories of Just War. Philosophia 34, 53–64 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-006-9010-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-006-9010-3

Keywords

Navigation