Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:12:17.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perfectionism for children, anti-perfectionism for adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Tim Fowler
Tim Fowler*
Affiliation:
SPAIS, University of Bristol, 11 Priory Road, BristolBS8 ITU, UK
*
*Email: timfowler84@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the debate between perfectionists and anti-perfectionists in the context of children. It suggests that the most influential and compelling arguments in favour of anti-perfectionism are adult-centric. It does this by considering four leading reasons given in favour of anti-perfectionism and shows that none apply in the case of children. In so doing, the paper defends a perfectionist account of upbringing from the attacks made against perfectionism more generally. Furthermore, because the refutation of the various anti-perfectionist arguments are made exclusively dealing with children, the paper suggests that the perfectionist view of upbringing is compatible with anti-perfectionist restrictions on dealing with adults. This dual view combining perfectionism for children and anti-perfectionism for adults is referred to as restricted perfectionism.

Keywords

perfectionismpolitical liberalismchildreneducationpaternalism
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 44 , Issue 3-4 , August 2014 , pp. 305 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arenson, Richard, and Shapiro, Ian. 1993. Democratic Authority and Religious Freedom: A critique of Wisconsin vs Yoder. Chap. 6 in Political Order: Nomos XXXVIII, edited by Sharpiro, , and Hardin, . London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Brighouse, Harry, and Swift, Adam. 2006. “Parents’ Rights and the Value of the Family.” Ethics 117 (1): 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, Harry, and Swift, Adam. Unpublished Manuscript. “Family Values.” Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph. 2000. “Legitimacy, Unanimity and Perfectionism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (1): 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Matthew. 2006. Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Matthew. 2011. “Debate: The Case Against the Comprehensive Enrolment of Children.” Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (3): 1–12.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1988. Am I My Parent's Keeper?: An Essay on Justice Between the Young and the Old. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2003. “Liberalism in Public and Private Morality.” In Perfectionism and Neutrality, edited by Klosko, George and Wall, Stephen, 32, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gert, Bernard, and Culver, Charles M.. 1979. “The Justification of Paternalism.” Ethics 89 (2): 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosko, George. 2000. Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus, 205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lecce, Steven. 2008. Against Perfectionism: Defending Liberal Neutrality, 266. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quong, Jonathan. 2011. Liberalism Without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom, 53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy, 34. London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar. 1999. “What Is a Child?” Ethics 109 (4): 715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, George. 1997. Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics, 106–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine. 2000. “Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (3): 205–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar