Abstract
The paper proposes a semantics for contextual (i.e., Temporal and Locative) Prepositional Phrases (CPPs) like during every meeting, in the garden, when Harry met Sally and where I’m calling from. The semantics is embodied in a multi-modal extension of Combinatory Categoral Grammar (CCG). The grammar allows the strictly monotonic compositional derivation of multiple correct interpretations for “stacked” or multiple CPPs, including interpretations whose scope relations are not what would be expected on standard assumptions about surfacesyntactic command and monotonic derivation. A type-hierarchy of functional modalities plays a crucial role in the specification of the fragment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artstein, R., & Francez, N. (2006). Plural time and temporal modification. In P. Dekker & R. van Rooy, (Eds.), 14th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. Amsterdam University. To appear in Linguistics and Philosophy.
Baldridge, J. (2002). Lexically specified derivational control in combinatory categorial grammar. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Baldridge, J. & Kruijff, G.-J. (2003). Multi-modal combinatory categorial grammar. In Proceedings of the 10th aanual meeting of the Eoropean Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). Budapest, April 2003.
Beaver, D., & Condoravdi, C. (2004) A uniform analysis of before and after. In R. Young & Y. Zhou (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT 13, Cornell University.
Cresswell M. (1985) Adverbial modification. Dordrecht, Reidel
Curry H.B., Feys R. (1958) Combinatory logic (Vol 1). Amsterdam, North Holland
Eckardt, R. (2002) Event semantics. In F. Hamm & E. Zimmermann (Eds.), Linguistiche Berichte Sonderheft (Semantics) (pp. 91-127). Helmut Buske Verlag.
Enç, M. (1986) Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9.
Francez, N., & Kaminski, M. (2004). An unbinding operator and its use in semantics of prepositionphrase modification. In Events04: Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, Leipzig, Germany, March 17-19 2004. To appear.
Gamut, L. T. E. (1991). Intensional logic and logical grammar (Vol. 2). The university of Chicago press.
Geis, M. (1970). Adverbial coordinate clauses in English. PhD thesis, MIT.
Giannakidou, A. (2002). Licencing and sensitivity in polarity items: from downward entailment to (non)veridicality. Chicago Linguistic Society, 38,
Giannakidou, A., & Zwarts, F. (To appear). Temporal, aspectual operators and (non)veridicality. In A. Giorgi, J. Higginbotham, & F. Pianesi, (Eds.), The syntax and semantics of tense and mode selection. Oxford University Press.
Groenendijk J., Stokhof M. (1996). Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(1): 39-101
Hepple, M. (1990). The grammar of processing order and dependency: A Categorial approach. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Hornstein N. (1977). Towards a theory of tense. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 521-557
Joshi A., Vijay-Shankar K., Weir D. (1991). The convergence of mildly context-sensitive formalisms. In: Sells P., Shieber S., Wasow T.(eds), Processing of linguistic structure. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Lambek J. (1958). The mathematics of sentence structure. Amer. Math. monthly 65, 154-170
Lewis D. (1970). General semantics. Synthese 22, 18-67
McCarthy J., Hayes P. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Meltzer B., Michie D., (eds), Machine intelligence (Vol. 4.). Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, pp. 473-502
Moortgat M. (1997). Categorial type logics. In J. van Benthem, & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, (pp. 93-178). North Holland.
Morrill G.V. (1994). Type Logical Grammar: Categorial logic of signs. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Muskens R. (1995). Meaning and partiality. Stanford, CA, CSLI publications
Park J. (1995). Quantifier scope and constituency. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), (pp. 205-212). San-Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
Partee B., Rooth M. (1983). Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In: Baüerle R., Schwartze C., von Stechow A., (eds), Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin, De Gruyter
Partee B.H. (1973). Some structural analogies between tense and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70, 601-609
Pratt I., Francez N. (2001). Temporal prepositions and temporal generalized quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 187-222
Pratt, I., & Francez, N. (1997) Derivation of temporal preposition meanings in lfg’s glue-language approach. In M. Butt & T. K. Holloway, (Eds.), Proceedings of LFG97, (pp. 360-371), San- Diego, CA, CSLI. On-line proceedings: http: www-csli.stanford.edu/publications/.
Von Stechow A. (2001). Temporal preposition phrases with quantifiers: Some additions to Pratt and Francez. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 755-800
Steedman, M. (1996). Surface structure and interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry monographs, MIT Press (Vol. 30).
Steedman M. (1997). Temporality. In: van Benthem J., Ter Meulen A. (eds), Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam, North Holland, pp. 895-938
Steedman, M. (2000). The Syntactic Process. MIT Press.
Steedman, M. (2002). Scope alternation and the syntax-semantics interface. Ms., Univ. of Edinburgh, URL http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ steedman/papers.html.
Veltman F. (1996). Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 221-261
Zwarts, J. & Winter, Y. (2000). Vector space semantics: A modeltheoretic analysis of locative prepositions. Journal of Logic, Language and Computation, (pp 171-213).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francez, N., Steedman, M. Categorial grammar and the semantics of contextual prepositional phrases. Linguistics & Philosophy 29, 381–417 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9000-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9000-8