Journal of Social Ontology (Mar 2016)

Epstein on Anchors and Grounds

  • Guala Francesco

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2016-0003
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 1
pp. 135 – 147

Abstract

Read online

The distinction between anchors and grounds is one of the most innovative contributions of The Ant Trap. In this commentary I will argue that the distinction suffers from an ambiguity between tokens and types. This leads Epstein to endorse pluralism about anchors and grounds, a position that is not justified in the book and to which there are plausible alternatives.

Keywords