Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Subsentential Phrases

29Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper briefly surveys the sentential proof-theoretic semantics for fragment of English. Then, appealing to a version of Frege's context-principle (specified to fit type-logical grammar), a method is presented for deriving proof-theoretic meanings for sub-sentential phrases, down to lexical units (words). The sentential meaning is decomposed according to the function-argument structure as determined by the type-logical grammar. In doing so, the paper presents a novel proof-theoretic interpretation of simple type, replacing Montague's model-theoretic type interpretation (in arbitrary Henkin models). The domains of derivations are collections of derivations in the associated "dedicated" natural-deduction proof-system, and functions therein (with no appeal to models, truth-values and elements of a domain). The compositionality of the semantics is analyzed. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Francez, N., Dyckhoff, R., & Ben-Avi, G. (2010). Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Subsentential Phrases. Studia Logica, 94(3), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9241-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free