Skip to main content
Log in

Accountability in Crisis: The Sponsorship Scandal and the Office of the Comptroller General in Canada

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For much of the last 50 years, a key platform animating public sector reform in Canada and elsewhere has been that efficiency and effectiveness can be achieved by adapting private sector financial management methods and practices. We argue that the recent re-establishment of the Office of the Comptroller General (OCG) of Canada represents a key element of a program of strengthening financial accountability that has emerged within the Canadian Federal Government. Although this program is longstanding and is associated Canada’s implementation of new public management initiatives, it has recently drawn particular sustenance from the sponsorship scandal in Canada. We demonstrate that the reincarnated OCG, re-established amid a rhetoric of “modernization” and of “strengthening” accountability, has a wide-ranging mandate to enhance financial and audit controls, create financial standards, nurture professional development, and oversee government spending. We explore some of the consequences of this development and of the broader financial accountability mechanisms introduced in response to the Sponsorship scandal within the Canadian public sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R.: 2004, ‹Just the Tip of the Iceberg’, Toronto Star, 15 February, A13

  • Auditor General of Canada: 1976, Report of the Auditor General (Department of Supply and Services, Ottawa)

  • Baker, R. and M. Rennie: 2006, ‹Forces Leading to the Adoption of Accrual Accounting by the Canadian Federal Government: An Institutional Perspective’, Canadian Accounting Perspectives 5(1), 83–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Borins S.: 2001, New Public Management, North American Style In McLaughlin K., Osborne S., Ferlie E. (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. London: Routledge, 181–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie G., C. Napier: 1996, Critical and Interpretive Histories: Insights into Accounting’s Present and Future Through its Past. Accountability, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(3), 7–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBC Online: 2005, ‹In-Depth: Sponsorship Scandal’, available at website http://www.cbc.ca/printtablestroy.jsp, November 1, 2006

  • English L., J. Guthrie, L. Parker: 2005, Recent Public Sector Financial Management Change in Australia: Implementing the Market Model. In: Guthrie J., Humphrey C., Olson O., Jones L. (eds.) International Public Financial Management Reform: Progress, Contradictions and Challenges. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press, 23–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendron Y., D. Cooper, B. Townley: 2001, In the Name of Accountability: State Auditing, Independence and New Public Management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 14(3), 278–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassco Commission: 1962, Report of the Royal Commission on Government Organization. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer

    Google Scholar 

  • Glor E.: 2001, Has Canada Adopted New Public Management? Public Management Review 3(1), 121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomery, J.: 2006, Restoring Accountability? Phase II Report (Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities, Ottawa)

  • Halligan J.: 2005, Public Management and Departments: Contemporary Themes – Future Agendas. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C.: 1998, The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert Commission: 1979, The Royal Commission on Financial Management and Accountability. Ottawa: Department of Supply and Services

    Google Scholar 

  • Library and Archives Canada: 2006, Comptroller General of Canada Sous-Fonds. Archival reference no.: R776-122-8-E

  • Llewellyn S., R. Eden, C. Lay: 1999, Financial and Professional Incentives in Health Care: Comparing the UK and Canadian Experiences. International Journal of Public Sector Management 12(1), 6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, B.: 2005, `Questioning Public Sector Accountability', Public Integrity 7(2), 95–109

  • Miller P., N. Rose: 1990, Governing Economic Life. Economy and Society 16(1), 395–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne J.: 2006, Strategy, Accountability and the New Role of the CFO: Modernizing Financial Management in Government. Toronto: The Conference Board of Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan R.: 2003, Holding Power to Account. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R.: 2004, ‹Follow that Man in the Getaway Car’, Globe and Mail, 21 February, A27

  • OECD: 1995, Governance in Transition: Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries (OECD Publications, Paris)

  • OECD: 2005, OECD in Figures – 2005 Edition. Paris: OECD Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson O., J. Guthrie, C. Humphrey: 1998, International Experiences with ‹New’ Public Financial Management (NPFM) Reforms: New World? Small World? Better World?. In Olson O., Guthrie J., Humphrey C. (eds.), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag, 17–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott J., P. Boonyarak: 2001, New Public Management: Public Policymaking Dilemmas: Balancing Between Administrative Capacity, Control and Democratic. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal 1, 487–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal L. A.: 2001, Beyond Policy Analysis: Public Issue Management in Turbulent Times. Toronto: Nelson Thomson Learning

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker L., J. Guthrie: 1993, The Australian Public Sector in the 1990s: New Accountability Regimes in Motion. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 2(1), 57–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perreault F.: 2006, Inside Gomery. Toronto: Douglas & McIntyre

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M.: (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M.: (2003). Auditing and the Production of Legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe V.: 1998, Efficiency Audit: An Assembly of Rationalities and Programmes. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(4), 377–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe V.: 1999, Knowing Efficiency: The Enactment of Efficiency in Efficiency Auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24(4), 333–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B.: 1989, Holding Government Bureaucracies Accountable (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT)

  • Shugarman, D. and I. Greene: 2006, ‹Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities, Phase I Report and Phase II Report’, Canadian Public Administration 49(2), 220–232

  • Spector, N.: 2006, ‹Judge Gomery’s Guide to Being Accountable’, Globe and Mail, February 6, A20

  • Stobo G.: 2006, Accounting for the Sins of the Father. Summit Journal 9(3), 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, J.: 2004, ‹Cleaning up a Fetid Mess’, Toronto Star, 10 February 2004, A17

  • Wanna J.: 2006, Insisting on Traditional Ministerial Responsibility and the Constitutional Independence of the Public Service: The Gomery Inquiry and the Canadian Sponsorship Scandal. Australian Journal of Public Administration 65(3), 15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W.: 2004, ‹To Lose Slime, Drain Swamp: Like ‹93 Liberals, Conservatives Can Campaign Against Rot’, National Post, 19 February, A1

  • Weeks, C.: 2006, ‹Grits Target Tory Accountability Legislation’, Canada.com. Available at website, http://www.canada.com/topics/news/politics/story.html?id=e611db9c-c74f-47d3-95a3-9d7563eb6c0c&k=55377, December 6, 2006

  • Wells P.: 2005, It’s not over yet. MacLean’s Magazine 118(46), 81–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J., S. Haggard: 1994, The Political Conditions for Economic Reform. In Williamson J. (ed.), The Political Economy of Policy Reform. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clinton Free.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Free, C., Radcliffe, V. Accountability in Crisis: The Sponsorship Scandal and the Office of the Comptroller General in Canada. J Bus Ethics 84, 189–208 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9681-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9681-8

Keywords

Navigation