Abstract
Kumārila’s commitment to the explanation of cognitive experiences not confined to valid cognition alone, allows a detailed discussion of border-line cases (such as doubt and error) and the admittance of absent entities as separate instances of cognitive objects. Are such absent entities only the negative side of positive entities? Are they, hence, fully relative (since a cow could be said to be the absent side of a horse and vice versa)? Through the analysis of a debated passage of the Ślokavārttika, the present article proposes a reconstruction of Kumārila’s view of the relation between erroneous cognitions and cognitions of absence (abhāva), and considers the philosophical problem of the ontological status of absence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Texts and Translations
NR: Nyāyaratnākara, in Ślokavārttika of Śrī Kumārila Bhaṭṭa with the commentary Nyāyaratnākara of Śrī Pārthasārathi Miśra, ed. by Ganga Sagar Rai, Ratna Publications, Varanasi 1993.
ŚV: in Ślokavārttikavyākhyā Tātpāryaṭikā of Uṃveka Bhaṭṭa, ed. by S.K. Ramanatha Sastri, revised by K. Kunjunni Raja and R. Thangaswamy, Madras University Sanskrit Series No. 13, Madras 1971.
ŚV: The Mīmāṃsāślokavārtika with the Commentary āśikā of Sucarita Miśra, ed. by K. Sāmbaśiva Śāstrī, Trivandrum Sanskrit Series, 90, 99, 150, Trivandrum 1926, 1929, 1943.
ŚV: Çlokavārtika translated from the original Sanskrit, with extracts from the commentaries “Kāśikā” of Sucarita Miśra and “Nyāyaratnākara” of Pārtha Sārathi Miśra, transl. by G. Jhā, Sri Satguru Publications, Delhi 1983 (1st edition published by the Asiatic Society, Calcutta 1900–1908).
TS: Tattvasaṅgraha of Śāntarakṣita with the commentary of Kamalaśīla, ed. with an intr. in Sanskrit by Embar Krishnamacharya, Oriental Institute, University of Baroda, Baroda 1984 and 1988 (1st ed. 1926).
B. Studies
Chakrabarti, A. (1997). Denying existence. The logic, epistemology and pragmatics of negative existentials and fictional discourse. Synthese Library (Vol. 261). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
Freschi E. (2008) Abhāvapramāṇa and error in Kumārila’s commentators. Nayoga Studies in Indian Culture and Buddhism: Saṃbhāṣā 27: 1–29
Freschi, E., & Graheli, A. (2005). Bhāṭṭamīmāṃsā and Nyāya on Veda and Tradition. In F. Squarcini (Ed.), Boundaries, dynamics and construction of traditions in South Asia. Firenze/New Delhi: FUP/Munshiram Manoharlal.
Kellner, B. (1996). There are no pots in the Ślokavārttika. Kumārila’s definition of the abhāvapramāṇa and patterns of negative cognition in Indian Philosophy. Journal of the Oriental Institute Madras, XLVI.3-4, 143–167.
Kellner, B. (1997). Nichts bleibt nichts. Die buddhistische Kritik an Kumārilas abhāvapramāṇa. Übersetzung und Interpretation von Śāntarakṣitas Tattvasaṃgraha vv. 1647–1690 mit Kamalaśīlas Pañjikā . Mit einem Anhang zur Geschichte der negativen Erkenntnis in der Indischen Philosophie. Wien: Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde.
Rao S. (1998) Perceptual error: The Indian theories. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu
Russell, B. (2009). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. New York: Routledge (Originally published: 1948)
Schmithausen, L. (1965). Maṇḍanamiśra’s Vibhramavivekaḥ. Mit einer Studie zur Entwicklung der indischen Irrtumslehre. Wien: Hermann Böhlaus Nachf.
Taber, J. (2001). Much ado about nothing: Kumārila, Śāntarakṣita, and Dharmakīrti on the cognition of non-being. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 121.1, 72–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freschi, E. Facing the Boundaries of Epistemology: Kumārila on Error and Negative Cognition. J Indian Philos 38, 39–48 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-009-9079-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-009-9079-7