Skip to main content
Log in

Achievable Hierarchies In Voting Games

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous work by Diffo Lambo and Moulen [Theory and Decision 53, 313–325 (2002)] and Felsenthal and Machover [The Measurement of Voting Power, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited (1998)], shows that all swap preserving measures of voting power are ordinally equivalent on any swap robust simple voting game. Swap preserving measures include the Banzhaf, the Shapley–Shubik and other commonly used measures of a priori voting power. In this paper, we completely characterize the achievable hierarchies for any such measure on a swap robust simple voting game. Each possible hierarchy can be induced by a weighted voting game and we provide a constructive proof of this result. In particular, the strict hierarchy is always achievable as long as there are at least five players.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banzhaf J. (1965), Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rugers Law Review 58, 317–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Diffo Lambo L., Moulen J. (2002), Ordinal equivalence of power notions in voting games. Theory and Decision 53, 313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M. (1998), The Measurement of Voting Power. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

  • Shapley L.S., Shubik M. (1954), A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. American Political Science Review 48, 787–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A.D. (1995), Mathematics and Politics. Textbooks in Mathematical Sciences, Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A.D., Zwicker W.S. (1999), Simple Games, Princeton University Press.

  • Tolle J. (2003), Power distribution in four-player weighted voting systems. Mathematics Magazine 76, 33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomiyama Y. (1987), Simple game, voting representation and ordinal power equivalence. International Journal on Policy and Information 11, 67–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron Parker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, J., Mcgrath, L. & Parker, C. Achievable Hierarchies In Voting Games. Theor Decis 61, 305–318 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-9003-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-9003-5

Keywords

Navigation