Skip to main content
Log in

An introduction to research ethics

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Practical issues throughout scientific research can be found to have an ethical aspect. There is a gray area in which scientific error (“honest error”) may be difficult to distinguish from unacceptably poor research practice or an unethical failure to follow scientific norms. Further, there is no clear margin between deceptive practices which are widely accepted and those which must be considered fraudulent. Practical problems arise in matters of data management and presentation, authorship, publication practices, “grantsmanship”, and rights of research trainees, as well as the well-recognized areas of human and animal experimentation. Beyond the gray areas, the legal definition of research misconduct is discussed in relation to research fraud, and the latest proposed definition of the Commission on Research Integrity is briefly reviewed. It is noted that the standards of ethical research are changing. Finally, there is a comment on the idea of institutional integrity in research, and the critical role of the mentor in transmitting research standards to the next generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research (1989)The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Institute of Medicine, Division of Health Sciences Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, P.J. (1992) Mistakes and fraud in medical research.Law, Medicine & Health Care 20: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas, J.D. (1993) Deviance in the practice of science.Academic Medicine 68: S77-S83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service (1991) Policies and procedures for dealing with possible scientific misconduct in extramural research procedures.Federal Register 56: 27383–27394, July 13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engler, R.L., Covell, J.W., Friedman, P.J., Kitcher, P.S. & Peters, R.M. (1987) Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research.New England Journal of Medicine 317: 1383–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kassirer, J.P. & Angell, M. (1991) On authorship and acknowledgments [editorial].New England Journal of Medicine 325:1510–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1988) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals.Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ibid (1993) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. 4th ed.JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association)269: 2282–2286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, P.J. (Chair) (1993) Standards for authorship and publication in academic radiology. Report of the Association of University Radiologists Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for the Responsible Conduct of Research.Radiology 189:33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fields, K.L. & Price, A.R. (1993) Problems in research integrity arising from misconceptions about the ownership of research.Academic Medicine 68: S60-S64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Commission on Research Integrity (1995)Integrity and Misconduct in Research: Report of the Advisory Commission on Research Integrity. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalichman, M.W. & Friedman, P.J. (1992) A pilot study of biomedical trainees’ perceptions concerning research ethics.Academic Medicine 67: 767–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Research trainees panel discussion (1990)Research Integrity in the 90’s. Conference at the University of California, San Diego.

  14. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences (1992)Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Science Foundation (1991) Misconduct in science and engineering: final rule.Federal Register 56: 22286–22290, May 14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pritchard, I.A. (1993) Integrity versus misconduct: learning the difference between right and wrong.Academic Medicine 68: S67-S71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is based on a survey lecture given to research trainees and faculty by the author, and presented at the International Symposium on Scientific Integrity, Warsaw, Poland, 23 November, 1995.

Dr. Friedman is Professor of Radiology, formerly Dean for Academic Affairs, at the UCSD School of Medicine. He has been involved in research misconduct issues for more than a decade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, P.J. An introduction to research ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 2, 443–456 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583931

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583931

Keywords

Navigation