Abstract
Being a member of both local and global teams requires constant distribution and re-distribution of attention, engagement, and intensive communication over synchronous and asynchronous channels with remote and local partners. We explore in this paper the increasing number of social worlds such participants distribute their attention to, how this affects their level of engagement and attention, and how the workspace, collaboration technologies, and interaction modes afford and constrain the communicative events. The use of information and collaboration technologies (ICT) shapes and reshapes work spaces, processes, and social interactions among team members, and team members reshape ICT and the way it is used. We use as a testbed the AEC Global Teamwork course established at Stanford in 1993 in collaboration with universities worldwide and provide examples from two sites—Stanford PBL Lab, California USA and Chalmers University, Goteborg Sweden. We used temporal analysis and qualitative methods of inquiry in order to study participants’ attention, how they used the site and the means, i.e., their social and material resources, to accomplish their interaction needs, and how they engaged throughout project reviews.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barley SR (1988) On technology, time, and social order: technologically induced change in the temporal organization of radiological work. In: Dubinskas FA (ed) Making time: ethnographies of high-technology organizations. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, pp 123–169
Chen M (2001) Design of a virtual auditorium. In: Proceedings of ACM multimedia, pp 489–498
Chen M (2003) A low-latency lip-synchronized videoconferencing system. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors and computing systems, pp 465–471
Dewey J (1928) Experience and nature. Dover, New York
Erickson F (1992) Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In: LeCompte M, Millroy WL, Preissle J (eds) The handbook of qualitative research in education. Academic Press, Inc., London, pp 202–225
Fitzpatrick G, Kaplan S, Mansfield T (1998) Applying the locales framework to understanding and designing. In: Proceedings Australasian computer human interaction conference (OzCHI’98), Adelaide, IEEE, pp 122–129
Fruchter R (1999) Architecture/engineering/construction teamwork: a collaborative design and learning space. ASCE J Comput Civil Eng 13(4):261–270
Fruchter R (2001) Bricks & bits & interaction. In: Terano T, Nishida T, Namatame A, Ohsawa Y, Tsumoto S, Washio T (eds) Lecture notes on artificial intelligence (LNAI), vol 2253. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–42
Fruchter R (2004) Global teamwork: cross-disciplinary, collaborative, geographically distributed e-learning environment. In: Bento J, Duarte J, Heitor M, Mitchell W (eds) Collaborative design and learning: competence building for innovation. Quorum Books/Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc., New York, pp 265–297
Fruchter R (2006) The fishbowl: degrees of engagement in global teamwork, LNAI. Springer, New York, pp 241–257
Fruchter R, Demian P (2002) CoMem: designing an interaction experience for reuse of rich contextual information from a corporate memory. AIEDAM Int J 16:127–147
Fruchter R, Reiner K (2000) Project memory capture in globally distributed facility design. In: Fruchter R, Roddis K, Pena-Mora F (eds) Proceedings of ASCE ICCCBE-VIII conference, Stanford, pp 14–16
Fruchter R, Yen S (2000) RECALL in action. In: Fruchter R, Roddis K, Pena-Mora F (eds) Proceedings of ASCE ICCCBE-VIII conference, Stanford, pp 1012–1021
Fruchter R, Demian P, Yin Z, Luth G (2003) Turning AEC knowledge into working knowledge. In: Flood I (ed) Proceedings of computing in civil engineering conference in conjunctions with ASCE National Convention, Nashville
Fruchter R, Saxena K, Breidenthal M, Demian D (2007) Collaborative exploration of a corporate memory in an interactive workspace. AIEDAM Int J 21(3):279–293
Greeno JG (1998) The situativity of knowing, learning and research. Am Psychol 53:5–26
Isaacs EA, Whittaker S, Frohlich D, O’Conaill B (1997) Informal communication re-examined: new functions for video in supporting opportunistic encounters. In: Finn KE, Sellen AJ, Wilbur SB (eds) Video-mediated communication. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 459–485
Johanson B, Fox A, Winograd T (2002) The interactive workspaces project: experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms. IEEE Pervasive Comput Mag 1(2):1–17
Jordan B, Henderson A (1995) Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. J Learn Sci 4(1):39–103
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lemke JL (2007) Video epistemology in-and-outside the box: traversing attentional spaces. In: Goldman-Segall R, Pea R (eds) Video research in the learning sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 39–52
O’Hara-Devereaux M, Johansen R (1994) GlobalWork, bridging distance, culture, and time. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers
Roush W (2005) Social machines: computing means connecting. MIT’s technology review. Retrieved 1 Aug 2006, from http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=14664&ch=infotech
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London
Secrist C, Koeyer I, de Bell H, Fogel A (2002) Combining digital video technology and narrative methods for understanding infant development. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qual Soc Res (On-line Journal) 3(2). Retrieved 22 Sep 2004, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-02/2-02secristetal-e.htm
Stake R (1995) The art of case research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
Strauss A (1978) A social world perspective. Stud Symb Interact 1:119–128
Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks
Yin R (1994) Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks
Acknowledgments
This study was partially funded by the Wallenberg Global Learning Network. Dr. Fruchter would like to thank all the past and present partner universities and corporations, AEC course alumni, and most importantly all the AEC student generations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fruchter, R., Ponti, M. Distributing attention across multiple social worlds. AI & Soc 25, 169–181 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0251-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0251-0