Skip to main content
Log in

The WALL: participatory design workspace in support of creativity, collaboration, and socialization

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A key challenge faced by organizations is to provide project teams with workspaces, information, and collaboration technologies that fosters creativity and high-performance team productivity. This requires understanding the relation between and impacts of (1) workspace, (2) activity and content that is created, and (3) social, behavioral, and cognitive aspects of work. This paper describes an exploratory study of everyday activities in the context of knowledge work in a shared workspace used by a high-tech global design team that explores future products. The study formalizes key elements for productive knowledge work as a function of tasks, context, and team. It identifies enablers, hindrances, and requirements for physical, virtual, and social work environments. The study identified, through semi-structured interviews, surveys, and on-site shadowing, a key workspace component that facilitates dynamic participation of all team members. This workspace component is a wall used as a large, public, physical display surface for project content (the WALL). The WALL acts as a mediator for individual reflection-in-action and team reflection-in-interaction. It serves as “social glue” both between individuals and between geographically distributed subgroups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen TJ (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):150–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloti V, Bly S (1996) Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team. In: CSCW96 conference, Cambridge, pp 209–218

  • Bosch-Sijtsema PM, Ruohomäki V, Vartiainen M (2009) Knowledge work productivity in distributed teams. J Knowl Manag 13(6):533–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brereton M (2004) Distributed cognition in engineering design: negotiating between abstract and material representations. In: Goldschmidt G, Porter WL (eds) Design representation. Springer, London, pp 83–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli L (1988) An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Des Stud 9(3):159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli L (1994) Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Button G, Sharrock W (1996) Project work: the organization of collaborative design and development in software engineering. CSCW 5(4):369–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Chachere J, Kunz J, Levitt R (2003) Can you accelerate your project using extreme collaboration? A model based analysis. CIFE Report TR154, http://cife.stanford.edu

  • Coakes E, Coakes J, Rosenberg D (2008) Co-operative work practices and knowledge sharing issues: a comparison of viewpoints. Int J Inf Manag 28(1):12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Prusak L (1995) Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know. Harper Business, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin N (1994) The art and politics of interpretation. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 500–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhard KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Winograd T, Kunz J, Liston K (1998) Designing and evaluating construction information workspaces. CIFE Project Report, http://cife.stanford.edu

  • Fruchter R (2001) Bricks & bits & interaction. In: Terano T, Nishida T, Namatame A, Ohsawa Y, Tsumoto S, Washio T (eds) Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) 2253. Springer, Berlin, pp 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruchter R (2006) The fishbowl: degrees of engagement in global teamwork. In: Smith I (ed) Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence (LNAI). Springer, Berlin, pp 241–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruchter R, Saxena K, Breidenthal M, Demian P (2007a) Collaborative exploration in an interactive workspace. AIEDAM Int J 21(3):279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruchter R, Swaminathan S, Boraiah M, Upadhyay C (2007b) Reflection-in-interaction. AI & Soc J 22(2):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson K (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci Technol Hum Values 16(4):448–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khemlani L (2009) Sutter medical center castro valley case study of an IPD project, AECbytes, http://www.aecbytes.com/buildingthefuture/2009/Sutter_IPDCaseStudy.html

  • Logan GD, Radcliffe DF (2004) Impromptu prototyping and artifacting: representing design ideas through things at hand, actions, and talk. In: Goldschmidt G, Porter WL (eds) Design representation. Springer, London, pp 127–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry M, Sanderson D (1998) Co-coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artifacts. Des Stud 19(3):273–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg D (2005) Complex information environments: issues in knowledge management and organizational learning. In: Merali Y, Snowden DJ (eds) Special issue on complexity and knowledge management, emergence, 2(4):136–150

  • Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble J, Wales R, Gossweiler R (2003) NASA’s MERboard an interactive collaborative workspace platform. In: O’Hare K, Perry M, Churchill E, Russell D (eds) Public and situated displays: social and international aspects of shared display technology. Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp 18–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Blevis E (2004) Concepts that support collocated collaborative work inspired by the specific context of industrial designers. In: CSCW04 conference, Chicago, pp 546–549

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the Stanford University–Aalto University School of Science and Technology research project ProWork, sponsored by TEKES, corporate partners, and the PBL Laboratory at Stanford University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renate Fruchter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fruchter, R., Bosch-Sijtsema, P. The WALL: participatory design workspace in support of creativity, collaboration, and socialization. AI & Soc 26, 221–232 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0307-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0307-1

Keywords

Navigation