Abstract
On 25 April 2002, the German Parliament has passed a strict new law referring to stem cell research. This law took effect on July 1, 2002. The so-called embryonic Stem Cell Act (“Stammzellgesetz — StZG”) permits the import of embryonic stem (ES) cells isolated from surplus IvF-embryos for research reasons. The production itself of ES cells from human blastocysts has been prohibited by the German Embryo Protection Act of 1990, with the exception of the use of ES cells which exist already. The debate on the legitimate use of ES cells escalated, after the main German research funding agency, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), unexpectedly published new guidelines recommending are stricted use of human ES cells for research. Meanwhile, the debate has ethically dividedsociety, political parties, government and church members into a group supporting and a group rejecting ES cell research. The arguments in favour of such a research can be summarized as arguments derived from a new “ethics ofhealing” calling for a therapeutic imperative, whereas the arguments against can be summarized as arguments violating the fundamental principle of human dignity as they imply the destruction of human embryos. This article willtry to present and evaluate various ethical arguments founded on the latest biological and medical data on the potential use of stem cell technologies. It will finally come to the conclusion that ES cell research is opposed to human dignity, since the procedures of isolating ES cells require the destruction and instrumentalization of human embryos. Human embryos are human beings at a very early stage of their development, fully possessing the ability of completing their development. At this very early stage, human embryos are extremely dependent and fragile, and thus vulnerable corporealities. Vulnerability and human dignity demand the protection of the embryo's corporeal integrity. Hence, this essay will try to propagate research with adult stem(AS) cells, a procedure which does not require the destruction of human embryos; with regard to the necessary plasticity, it should be emphasized that AS cells very much resemble ES cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, A.: 2001, ‘Stem-Cell Research Delayed by German Ethics Council’, Nature 411, 875.
Alison, M.R., R. Poulsom, R. Jeffery, A.P. Dhillon, A. Quaglia, J. Jacob, M. Novelli, G. Prentice, J. Williamson and N.A. Wright: 2000, ‘Hepatocytes from Non-hepatic Adult Stem Cells’, Nature 406, 257.
Antoniou, M.: 2001, ‘The Case Against’, Nature Medicine 7, 397-399.
Aristoteles. Politeia I3, 1253a7-18.
Aristoteles: 1984, Metaphysik. German translation by H. Bonitz, Hamburg.
Beier, H.M.: 1999, ‘Die Phänomene Totipotenz und Pluripotenz: Von der klassischen Embryologie zu neuen Therapiestrategien’, Reproduktionsmedizin 15, 190-199.
Benninger, Y., S. Marino, R. Hardegger, C. Weissmann, A. Aguzzi and S. Brandner: 2000, ‘Differentiation and Histological Analysis of Embryonic Stem Cell-derived Neural Transplants in Mice’, Brain Pathol 10, 330-341.
Birnbacher, D.: 1997, ‘Das Dilemma des Personbegriffs’, in: P. Strasser and E. Starz (eds.), Personsein aus bioethischer Sicht. Stuttgart, pp. 9-25.
Brazelton, T.R., F.M. Rossi, G.I. Keshet and H.M. Blau: 2000, ‘From Marrow to Brain: Expression of Neuronal Phenotypes in Adult Mice’, Science 290, 1775-1779.
Brüstle, O., C.A. Spiro and K. Karram et al.: 1997, ‘In-vitro Generated Neural Precursors Participate in Mammalian Brain Development’, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 14809-14814.
Brüstle, O., K.N. Jones and R.D. Learish: 1999, ‘Embryonic Stem Cell-derived Glial Precursors: A Source of Myelinating Transplants’, Science 285, 754-756.
Carter, W.R.: 1980, ‘Once and Future Persons’, American Philosophical Quarterly 17, 61-66.
Clarke, D.L., C.B. Johansson, J. Wilbertz, B. Veress, E. Nilsson, H. Karlstrom, U. Lendahl and J. Frisen: 2000, ‘Generalized Potential of Adult Neural Stem Cells’, Science 288, 1660-1663.
Department of Health and Social Security: 1984, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Warnock-Report). London.
DFG: 1999, ‘Stellungnahme zum Problemkreis “Humane embryonale Stammzellen” vom 19.3.1999’, www.dfg.de/stammzellen.
DFG: 2001, ‘Empfehlungen der Deutschen Forschungsge-meinschaft zur Forschung mit menschlichen Stammzellen vom 3.5.2001’, www.dfg.de/aktuell/das_neueste.html#stamm.
Enquete Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages ‘Recht und Ethik der modernen Medizin’: 2002, Teilbericht Stammzellenforschung. Zweiter Zwischenbericht, www.bundestag.de/gremien/medi-2zwischen.html.
Ewig, S.: 2001, ‘Ethik des Heilens und ärztliches Ethos’, in: Biomedizin und Menschenwürde (eds.), ZEI Discussion Paper C97. Bonn, pp. 17-26.
Ferrari, G., G. Cusella-De Angelis, M. Coletta, E. Paolucci, A. Stornaiuolo, G. Cossu and F. Mavilio: 1998, ‘Muscle Regeneration by Bone-marrow Derived Myogenic Progenitors’, Science 279, 1528-1530.
Ford, N.M.: 1989, When Did I Begin? Conception of the Human Individual in History, Philosophy and Science. Cambridge, 2nd ed.
Gehlen, A.: 1986, Der Mensch (1940). Berlin, 13th ed.
Gesetz zum Schutze von Embryonen: 1990. Bundesgesetzblatt I 13 December, 2746-2748.
Gesetz zur Sicherstellung des Embryonenschutzes im Zusammenhang mit Einfuhr und Verwendung menschlicher embryonaler Stammzellen (Stammzellengesetz — StZG) vom 28.6.2002, www.bmbf.de/pub/stammzellgesetz.pdf.
Gordijn, B.: 1999, ‘The Troublesome Concept of the Person’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20, 347-359.
Gussoni, E., Y. Soneoka, C.D. Strickland, E.A. Buzney, M.K. Khan, A.F. Flint, L.M. Kunkel and R.C. Mulligan: 1999, ‘Dystrophin Expression in the Mdx Mouse Restored by Stem Cell Transplantation’, Nature 401, 390-394.
Haeffner, G.: 1994, ‘Aufgrund wovon kommt einem Menschen die Würde einer Person zu?’, in: P. Ehlen (ed.), Der Mensch und seine Frage nach dem Absoluten. München, pp. 79-107.
Haeffner, G.: 1989, Philosophische Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 3rd ed.
Hoerster, N.: 1996, ‘Menschenrecht auf Leben und Tötungsverbot’, Merkur 50/2, 880-892.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: 1990, Chapter 37. London.
Jiang, Y., B.N. Jahagirdar, R.L. Reinhardt, R.E. Schwartz, C.D. Keene, X.R. Ortiz-Gonzalez, M. Reyes, T. Lenvik, T. Lund, M. Blackstad, J. Du, S. Aldrich, A. Lisberg, W.C. Low, D.A. Largaespada and C.M. Verfaillie: 2002, ‘Pluripotency of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adult Marrow’, Nature 418(6893), 41-49.
Kant, I.: 1965. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Edited by K. Vorländer. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 3rd ed.
Kerber, W.: 1998, Sozialethik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Kim, J.H., J.M. Auerbach, J.A. Rodriguez-Gomez, I. Velasco, D. Gavin, N. Lumelsky, S.H. Lee, J. Nguyen, R. Sanchez-Pernaute, K. Bankiewicz, and R. McKay: 2002, ‘Dopamine Neurons Derived from Embryonic Stem Cells Function in an Animal Model of Parkinson's Disease’, Nature 418(6893), 50-56.
Knoepffler, N.: 1999, Forschung an menschlichen Embryonen. Was ist verantwortbar? Stuttgart/Leipzig: Hirzel.
Krause, D.S., N.D. Theise, M.I. Collector, O. Henegariu, S. Hwang, R. Gardner, S. Neutzel and S.J. Sharkis: 2001, ‘Multi-organ, Multi-lineage Engraftment by a Single Bone Marrow-derived Stem Cell’, Cell 105(3), 369-377.
Kummer, C.: 2002, ‘Läßt sich ein Zeitpunkt für den Beginn des personalen Menschseins angeben?’, in: F.S. Oduncu, U. Schroth and W. Vossenkuhl (eds.), Stammzellenforschung und therapeutisches Klonen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 148-162.
Lachmann, P.: 2001, ‘Stem Cell Research — Why is it Regarded as a Threat?’, EMBO 2, 165-168.
Lee, S.H., N. Lumelsky, L. Studer, J.M. Auerbach and R.D. McKay: 2000, ‘Efficient Generation of Midbrain and Hindbrain Neurons from Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells’, Nature Biotechnol 18, 675-679.
Liu, S., Y. Qu, T.J. Stewart, M.J. Howard, S. Chakrabortty, T.F. Holekamp and J.W. McDonald: 2000, ‘Embryonic Stem Cells Differentiate into Oligodendrocytes and Myelinate in Culture and after Spinal Cord Transplantation’, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 6126-6131.
Mieth, D.: 2000, ‘Going to the Roots of the Stem Cell Debate’, EMBO 1, 4-6.
Moore, K.L. and T.V.N. Persaud: 1996, Embryologie. Lehrbuch und Atlas der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen. Stuttgart: Schattauer, 4th ed.
Nationaler Ethikrat: 2001, ‘Stellungnahme zum Import menschlicher embryonaler Stammzellen’, www.nationalerethikrat.de.
Oduncu, F.S.: 2001, ‘Klonierung von Menschen — Biologischtechnische Grundlagen, Ethisch-rechtliche Bewertung’, Ethik Med 13, 111-126.
Oduncu, F.S.: 2002, ‘Germany Permits Import of ES Cells’, Nat Biotechnol 20(3), 224.
Oduncu, F.S.: 2003, ‘Moralischer Status von Embryonen’, in: M. Düwell and K. Steigleder (eds.), Bioethik — Eine Einführung. Reihe «suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft» (stw 1597), Frankfurt a.M. 2003, in press.
Oduncu, F.S., U. Schroth and W. Vossenkuhl: 2002, Stammzellenforschung und therapeutisches Klonen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Oduncu, F.: 1998, Hirntod und Organtransplantation — Medizinische, juristische und ethische Fragen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Parfit, D.: 1973, ‘Later Selves and Moral Principles’, in: A. Montefiore (ed.), Philosophy and Personal Relations. Montreal.
Peterson, B.E. et al.: 1999, ‘Bone Marrow as a Potential Source of Hepatic Oval Cells’, Science 284, 1168-1170.
Portman, A.: 1942, Die Biologie und das neue Menschenbild. Bern.
Reyes, M., T. Lund, T. Lenvik, D. Aguiar, L. Koodie and C.M. Verfaillie: 2001, ‘Purification and Ex Vivo Expansion of Postnatal Human Marrow Mesodermal Progenitor Cells’, Blood 98(9), 2615-2625.
Reyes, M. and C.M. Verfaillie: 2001, ‘Characterization of Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells, a Subpopulation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells’, Ann N Y Acad Sci 938, 231-233; Discussion 233–235.
Reubinoff, B.E., M.F. Pera, C.Y. Fong, A. Trounson and A. Bongso: 2000, ‘Embryonic Stem Cell Lines from Human Blastocysts: Somatic Differentiation in vitro’, Nature Biotechnol 18, 399-404.
Reubinoff, B.E., P. Itsykson, T. Turetsky, M.F. Pera, E. Reinhartz, A. Itzik and T. Ben-Hur: 2001, ‘Neural Progenitors from Human Embryonic Stem Cells’, Nature Biotechnol 19, 1134-1140.
Richards, M., C.Y. Fong, W.K. Chan, P.C. Wong and A. Bongso: 2002, ‘Human Feeders Support Prolonged Undifferentiated Growth of Human Inner Cell Masses and Embryonic Stem Cells’, Nature Biotechnol 20(9), 933-936.
Schneider, I.: 2002, ‘Beschleunigung — Merkantilisierung — Entdemokratisierung?’, in: F.S. Oduncu, U. Schroth and W. Vossenkuhl (eds.), Stammzellenforschung und therapeutisches Klonen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 211-245.
Schott, H.: 2002, ‘Embryonenforschung und PID: “Ethik des Heilens” versus “Ethik der Menschenwürde”’, Deutsches Ärzteblatt 99(4), A-172-175.
Schroth, U.: 2002, ‘Forschung mit embryonalen Stammzellen und Präimplantationsdiagnostik im Lichte des Rechts’, in: F.S. Oduncu, U. Schroth and W. Vossenkuhl (eds.), Stammzellenforschung und therapeutisches Klonen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 249-289.
Singer, P.: 1979, Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, J.A., J. Itskovitz-Eldor, S.S. Shapiro, M.A. Waknitz, J.J. Swiergiel, V.S. Marshall and J.M. Jones: 1998. ‘Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts’, Science 282(5391), 1145-1147.
Tooley, M.: 1983, Abortion and Infanticide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Westphal, S.P.: 2002, ‘Ultimate Stem Cell Discovered’, New Scientist, 23 January.
Wilmut, I., A.E. Schnieke, J. McWhir, A.J. Kind and K.H. Campbell: 1997, ‘Viable Offspring Derived from Fetal and Adult Mammalian Cells’, Nature 385, 810-813.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oduncu, F.S. Stem cell research in Germany: Ethics of healing vs. human dignity. Med Health Care Philos 6, 5–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022585217710
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022585217710