Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:10:40.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioral winter: Disillusionment with applied behavioral science and a path to spring forward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

David Gal Open the ORCID record for David Gal [Opens in a new window]  and
Derek D. Rucker
David Gal
Affiliation:
University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. davidgal@uic.edu; https://business.uic.edu/profiles/david-gal/
Derek D. Rucker
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. d-rucker@kellogg.northwestern.edu; https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/directory/rucker_derek_d.aspx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chater & Loewenstein thoughtfully express their disillusionment with contemporary applied behavioral science, particularly as it pertains to public policy. Although they fault an overemphasis on i-frame approaches, their proposed alternatives leave doubt regarding whether behavioral science has much, if anything, useful to offer policy. We offer two critical principles to guide and motivate more relevant behavioral science.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e156
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., & Gal, D. (2016). Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, P. J., & Tracy, J. D. (2022). A reassessment of the potential for loss-framed incentive contracts to increase productivity: A meta-analysis and a real-effort experiment. Experimental Economics, 25(5), 1441–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2018). The loss of loss aversion: Will it loom larger than its gain? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(3), 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2022). Experimental validation bias limits the scope and ambition of applied behavioural science. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T., & Gal, D. (2021). The Marlboro men don't cry: Understanding the gendered perceptions of people seeking mental health care. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(2), 423–437.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed