Skip to main content
Log in

On Hans Reichenbach’s inductivism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the first to criticize the verifiability theory of meaning embraced by logical empiricists, Reichenbach ties the significance of scientific statements to their predictive character, which offers the condition for their testability. While identifying prediction as the task of scientific knowledge, Reichenbach assigns induction a pivotal role, and regards the theory of knowledge as a theory of prediction based on induction. Reichenbach’s inductivism is grounded on the frequency notion of probability, of which he prompts a more flexible version than that of Richard von Mises. Unlike von Mises, Reichenbach attempts to account for single case probabilities, and entertains a restricted notion of randomness, more suitable for practical purposes. Moreover, Reichenbach developed a theory of induction, absent from von Mises’s perspective, and argued for the justification of induction. This article outlines the main traits of Reichenbach’s inductivism, with special reference to his book Experience and prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carnap, R. (1936–1937). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 419–471; 4, 1–40.

  • Carnap R. (1946) Remarks on induction and truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6: 590–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawid P., Galavotti M. C. (2009) De Finetti’s subjectivism, objective probability, and the empirical validation of probability assessments. In: Galavotti M. C. (eds) Bruno de Finetti, radical probabilist. College Publications, London, pp 97–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, F., & Glymour, C. (in press). Hans Reichenbach’s probability logic. In D. Gabbay, S. Hartmann, & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic X: Inductive logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Feigl, H. (1950). De principiis non disputandum ...? On the meaning and the limits of justification. In M. Black (Ed.), Philosophical analysis (pp. 119–56). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (Reprinted in H. Feigl, Inquiries and provocations: selected writings 1929–1974, pp. 237–68, by R. S. Cohen, Ed., 1980, Dordrecht: Reidel).

  • Galavotti M. C. (2001) Subjectivism, objectivism and objectivity in Bruno de Finetti’s Bayesianism. In: Corfield D., Williamson J. (eds) Foundations of Bayesianism. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp 173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Galavotti M. C. (2003) Kinds of probabilism. In: Parrini P., Salmon W. C., Salmon M. H. (eds) Logical empiricism. Historical and contemporary perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 281–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Galavotti M. C. (2005) Philosophical introduction to probability. CSLI, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking . (1968) One problem about induction. In: Lakatos I. (eds) The problem of inductive logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 44–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1933, 1949). Die logischen Grundlagen des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs, Erkenntnis, 3, 401–425. (English edition with modifications of The logical foundations of the concept of probability. In H. Feigl & W. Sellars (Eds.), 1949, Readings in philosophical analysis (pp. 305–323). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts).

  • Reichenbach, H. (1933, 1978). Carnap’s logical structure of the world. Kantstudien, 38, 199–201 (Reprinted in English in Reichenbach 1978, Vol. I, pp. 405–408).

  • Reichenbach H. (1935) Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre. Sijthoff, Leyden

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach H. (1936) Logicist empiricism in Germany and the present state of its problems. Journal of Philosophy 6: 141–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1937). La philosophie scientifique: une esquisse de ses traits principaux. In Travaux du IX Congrès International de Philosophie (pp. 86–91). Paris: Hermann.

  • Reichenbach H. (1938) Experience and prediction. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1949). The theory of probability. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Second edition 1971. English translation of Reichenbach 1935 with modifications).

  • Reichenbach H. (1951) The verifiability theory of meaning. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 53: 46–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1978). Selected writings, 1909–1953. In M. Reichenbach & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), (Vols. I–II). Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel.

  • Salmon W. C. (1953) The uniformity of nature. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14: 39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W. C. (1963) On vindicating induction. Philosophy of Science 30: 252–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W. C. (1979) The philosophy of Hans Reichenbach. In: Salmon W. C. (eds) Hans Reichenbach: Logical empiricist. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W. C. (1991) Hans Reichenbach’s vindication of induction. Erkenntnis 35: 99–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W. C. (1994) Carnap, Hempel, and Reichenbach on scientific realism. In: Salmon W. C., Wolters G. (eds) Logic, language, and the structure of scientific theories. University of Pittsburgh Press and Konstanz: Universitätsverlag, Pittsburgh, pp 237–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W. C. (1998) Causality and explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W.C. et al (1999) Ornithology in a cubical world: Reichenbach on scientific realism. In: Greenberger D. (eds) Epistemological and experimental perspectives on quantum physics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 303–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickore, J., Steinle, F. (eds) (2006) Revisiting discovery and justification. Dordrecht, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen B. (1882) Rational belief and the common cause principle. In: McLaughlin R. (eds) What? Where? When? Why? Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, R. (1939). Probability, statistics and truth. London, New York: Allen and Unwin (Reprinted New York: Dover, 1957. English revised edition of Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit. Vienna: Springer, 1928).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Carla Galavotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galavotti, M.C. On Hans Reichenbach’s inductivism. Synthese 181, 95–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9589-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9589-6

Keywords

Navigation