Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Students at Risk for Being Reported for Cheating

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Student cheating has always been a problem in higher education, but detection of cheating has become easier with technology (Bertram Gallant 2008). As a result, more students are being caught and reported for cheating. While reporting cheating is not a negative, the rippling effects of reported cheating (e.g., reduced time to degree) may be felt by some populations (e.g., first-generation college students, international students) more than others. Thus, preventing cheating would be a preferable option for all involved.

Identifying those at risk for being reported for cheating is a first step in developing preventive measures. Previous research has attempted to do this through the use of self-report surveys, but such research takes considerable time and resources to conduct and suffers from low response rates and social desirability bias. To address this limitation in existing research, this study links existing data from records of other-reported cheating to university registration data in order to examine 6 cheating risk factors identified in previous research: maturity level, gender, grade point average, major, international student status, and fear of punishment. The results of the study suggest that international and transfer students, particularly those who are male, in high-risk majors (like computer science, economics and engineering), and have lower grade point averages, are in particular need of preventative education. Likewise, those faculty who teach in computer science, engineering and economics majors should do more to educate implement practices to reduce the likelihood of cheating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17(4), 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates. D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., Walker, S. (2014). “lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4.” ArXiv e-print; submitted to Journal of Statistical Software, http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823.

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram Gallant, T. (2008). Academic Integrity in the twenty-first century: A teaching and learning imperative. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram Gallant, T., & Drinan, P. (2008). Toward a model of academic integrity institutionalization: informing practice in higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 38(2), 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram Gallant, T., Anderson, M.G., & Killoran, C. (2011). Academic integrity in a mandatory physics lab: the influence of post-graduate aspirations and grade point averages. Science & Engineering Ethics. Online First Issue. Reprinted in Volume 19, Issue 1 (2013), pgs. 219–235.

  • Bunn, D., Caudill, S., & Gropper, D. (1992). Crime in the classroom: an economic analysis of undergraduate student cheating behavior. Research in Economic Education, 23(2), 197–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coren, A. (2011). Turning a blind eye: faculty who ignore student cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(4), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D., & Spiller, M. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., Grover, C., Becker, A., & McGregor, L. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Williams, L. E., Francis, B., & Haines, V. J. (1996). College cheating: ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gareis, E. (2012). Intercultural friendship: effects of home and host region. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(4), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N., & Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: when plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics and Behavior, 15(3), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jendrek, M. P. (1989). Faculty reactions to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 30(5), 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith-Spiegel, P., Tabachnick, B. G., Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Washburn, J. (1998). Why professors ignore cheating: opinions of a national sample of psychology instructors. Ethics and Behavior, 8(3), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkvliet, J., & Sigmund, C. L. (1999). Can we control cheating in the classroom? Journal of Economic Education, 30, 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, R.A., Chapman, K.J., & Weiss, J.E. (2000). A cross-national exploration of business students’ attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies toward academic dishonesty. Journal of Education for Business, March/April, 231–235.

  • Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry, 62(3), 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1993). Faculty responses to academic dishonesty: the influence of student honor codes. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 647–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1997). Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty : honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1996). What we know about cheating in college: longitudinal trends and recent developments. Change, 28(1), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: a replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the middle east: individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J., & Miethe, T. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70(4), 872–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, S. (2000). Addressing the mental health concerns of international students. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78(Spring), 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuss, E. M. (1984). Academic integrity: comparing faculty and student attitudes. Improving College and University Teaching, 32(3), 140–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006). Factors influencing engineering students’ decisions to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 643–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situation and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50, 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1992). International students and American university culture: Adjustment issues. Paper presented at the Washington Area Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (WATESOL) Annual Convention. ED 350 968.

  • Singhal, A. C. (1982). Factors in students’ dishonesty. Psychological Reports, 51(3), 775–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, A. A. C., & Rocha, M. F. (2010). Cheating by economics and business undergraduate students: an exploratory international assessment. Higher Education, 59, 663–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. G. (1999). Differences between women and men regarding decisions to commit test cheating. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandehey, M., Diekhoff, G., & LaBeff, E. (2007). College cheating: a twenty-year follow-up and the addition of an honor code. Journal of College Student Development, 48(4), 468–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, R., Davidson, L., & Bell, M. C. (2008). Faculty attitudes and behaviors concerning student cheating. College Student Journal, 42(1), 164–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Li, M., & Sligo, F. (2008). Chinese international students’ satisfaction levels with their experiences in New Zealand. Paper presented at ANZCA009 Conference, Power and Place. Wellington. Retrieved August 29th, 2014 from http://www.academia.edu/934323/Chinese_international_students_satisfaction_levels_with_their_learning_experiences_in_New_Zealand.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0069, USA

    Tricia Bertram Gallant

  2. Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0631C, USA

    Nancy Binkin & Michael Donohue

Authors
  1. Tricia Bertram Gallant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nancy Binkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Donohue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tricia Bertram Gallant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bertram Gallant, T., Binkin, N. & Donohue, M. Students at Risk for Being Reported for Cheating. J Acad Ethics 13, 217–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9235-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9235-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation