Abstract
Schelling’s 1809 Freiheitsschrift (Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom), perhaps his most widely read work, presents considerable difficulties of understanding. In this paper I offer an interpretation of the work in relation to Kant. My focus is on the relation in each case of their theory of human freedom to their general metaphysics, a relation which both regard as essential. The argument of the paper is that Schelling may be viewed as addressing and resolving a problem which arises from Kant’s use of transcendental idealism to defend the possibility of human freedom, deriving from the challenge posed by Spinozism. One major innovation in Schelling’s theory of human freedom is his claim that it presupposes the reality of evil, and I argue that this thesis also provides a key to the highly original metaphysics of the Freiheitsschrift. The relation of Schelling’s theory of freedom to his general metaphysics is therefore complex, for it goes in two directions: the metaphysics are not simply presupposed by the theory of freedom but are also in part derived from it. These new metaphysics also, I argue, allow Schelling to resolve a problem which his own earlier Spinozistic system had left unresolved.
Zuerst erschienen als: Sebastian Gardner, The Metaphysics of Human Freedom: From Kant’s Transcendental Idealism to Schelling’s Freiheitsschrift, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25.1 (2017), 133–156. Copyright © BSHP, reprinted by permission of Taylor & Francis Ltd, www.tandfonline.com, on behalf of BSHP.
Literatur
Baader, F. v. (1851), Über den Affekt der Bewunderung und der Ehrfurcht, in: Gesammelte Schriften zur philosophischen Erkenntniswissenschaft als speculative Logik, hg. v. Hoffmann, F., Leipzig, 25–32.Search in Google Scholar
Creuzer, C. A. L. (1793), Skeptische Betrachtungen über die Freyheit des Willens: mit Hinsicht auf die neuesten Theorien über dieselbe, Gießen.Search in Google Scholar
Dews, P. (2008), The Idea of Evil, Oxford.10.1002/9780470691830Search in Google Scholar
Eschenmayer, K. A. (1803), Die Philosophie in ihrem Übergang zur Nichtphilosophie, Erlangen.Search in Google Scholar
Franks, P. (2005), All or Nothing. Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism, Cambridge, Mass.10.4159/9780674272750Search in Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970), Werke in 20 Bänden, hg. v. Moldenhauer, E., u. Michel, K. M., Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1988), Schelling: Vom Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit (1809) (= Gesamtausgabe, Abt. 2, Bd. 42), hg. v. Schüßler, I., Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1997), Der Satz vom Grund (= Gesamtausgabe, Abt. 1, Bd. 10), hg. v. Jaeger, P., Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1900 ff.), Gesammelte Schriften, 29 Bde., hg. v. d. Königl. Preuß. Akad. d. Wiss., Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Kosch, M. (2006), Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling and Kierkegaard, Oxford.10.1093/0199289115.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
O’Connor, B. (2013), Self-Determination and Responsibility in Schelling’s Freiheitsschrift, in: Studies in Social and Political Thought 21, 3–18.Search in Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (1996), Heideggerian Postmodernism and Metaphysical Politics, in: European Journal of Philosophy 4.1, 17–37.10.1111/j.1468-0378.1996.tb00063.xSearch in Google Scholar
Reinhold, K. L. (1792), Erörterung des Begriffes von der Freiheit des Willens, in: Briefe über die kantische Philosophie 2, Leipzig, 262–308.10.1515/9783111432151.262Search in Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1856–1861), Sämmtliche Werke, hg. v. Schelling, K. A. W., Stuttgart u. Augsburg.Search in Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1946), Die Weltalter. Fragmente. In den Urfassungen von 1811 und 1813, in: Schellings Werke, Münchner Jubiläumsdruck, Nachlaßband, hg. v. Schröter, M., München.Search in Google Scholar
Schmid, C. C. E. (1790), Versuch einer Moralphilosophie, Jena.Search in Google Scholar
Ulrich, J. A. H. (1788), Eleutheriologie, oder über Freiheit und Notwendigkeit: Zum Gebrauch der Vorlesungen in den Michaelsferien, Jena.Search in Google Scholar
Watkins, E., u. Brewer, K. (2012), A Difficulty Still Awaits: Kant, Spinoza, and the Threat of Theological Determinism, in: Kant-Studien 103, 163–187.10.1515/kant-2012-0010Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
