Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical issues in communicating science

  • Editorial Overview
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 August 2007

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, M.S. (2000) Normative Orientations of University Faculty and Doctoral Students, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guertin, Robert P. (1995) Commentary on “How are Scientific Corrections made?” (N. Kiang), Science and Engineering Ethics 1: 357–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bird, S.J. and Housman, D.E. (1995) Trust and the Collection, Selection, Analysis and Interpretation of Data: A Scientist’s View, Science and Engineering Ethics 1: 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffman-Kim, D. (2000) Commentary on “Normative Orientations of University Faculty and Doctoral Students” (M.S. Anderson), Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 463–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The Task Force on Women, Minorities and the Handicapped in Science and Technology (1989) Changing America: The New Face of Science and Engineering—Final report, The Task Force on Women, Minorities and the Handicapped in Science and Technology, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosser, Sue V. (1990) Female Friendly Science, Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spanier, Bonnie (2000) Transforming Science Curricula in Higher Education: Feminist Contributions, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shulman, Bonnie (2000) Commentary on “Transforming Science Curricula in Higher Education: Feminist Contributions” (B. Spanier), Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 481–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chew, Frances S. (2000) Talking about Race in a Scientific Context, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 485–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, Fatimah (2000) Talking and Teaching about Human Biological Variation—Commentary on “Talking about Race in a Scientific Context” (F.S. Chew), Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 495–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubino, Carl A. (2000) The Politics of Certainty: Conceptions of Science in an Age of Uncertainty, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sagan, Carl (1987) The Burden of Skepticism, The Skeptical Inquirer 1: 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki, David (1998) A Personal Journey Through Genetics and Civil Rights, Science 281: 1796–1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seitz, Frederick (2000) Decline of the Generalist, Nature 403: 484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Valenti, JoAnn M. (2000) Improving the Scientist/Journalist Conversation, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rensberger, Boyce (2000) Why Scientists Should Cooperate With Journalists, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 549–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers, Carol L. (2000) Making the Audience a Key Participant in the Science Communication Process, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 553–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Priest, Susanna Horng and Gillespie, Allen W. (2000) Seeds of Discontent: Expert Opinion, Mass Media Messages, and the Public Image of Agricultural Biotechnology, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Geller, Lisa N. (2000) Commentary on “Seeds of Discontent: Expert Opinion, Mass Media Messages, and the Public Image of Agricultural Biotechnology” (S.H. Priest and A.W. Gillespie), Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 541–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinch, Trevor (2000) The Golem: Uncertainty and Communicating Science, Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 511–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jasanoff, Sheila (2000) Talking about Science — Commentary on “The Golem: Uncertainty and Communicating Science” (T. Pinch), Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 525–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krimsky, Sheldon (2000) Commentary on “The Politics of Certainty” (C.A. Rubino), Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 509–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Skuse, D.H., James, R.S., Bishop, D.V.M., Coppin, B., Dalton, P., Aamodt-Leeper, G., Bacarese-Hamilton, M., Creswell, C., McGurk, R. and Jacobs, P.A. (1997) Evidence from Turner’s Syndrome of an imprinted X-linked locus affecting cognitive function, Nature 387: 705–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McGuffin, P. and Scourfield, J. (1997) A father’s imprint on his daughter’s thinking, Nature 387: 652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Hamilton College, 13323, Clinton, New York, USA

    Jinnie M. Garreu

  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 12-188, 77 Massachuseus Avenue, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Stephanie J. Bird PhD

Authors
  1. Jinnie M. Garreu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephanie J. Bird PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9016-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garreu, J.M., Bird, S.J. Ethical issues in communicating science. Sci Eng Ethics 6, 435–442 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0001-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0001-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation