Skip to main content
Log in

Turning a Madhyamaka Trick: Reply to Huntington

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Huntington (2007); argues that recent commentators (Robinson, 1957; Hayes, 1994; Tillemans, 1999; Garfield and Priest, 2002) err in attributing to Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti a commitment to rationality and to the use of argument, and that these commentators do violence to the Madhyamaka project by using rational reconstruction in their interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s and Candrakīrti’s texts. Huntington argues instead that mādhyamikas reject reasoning, distrust logic and do not offer arguments. He also argues that interpreters ought to recuse themselves from argument in order to be faithful to these texts. I demonstrate that he is wrong in all respects: Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti deploy arguments, take themselves to do so, and even if they did not, we would be wise to do so in commenting on their texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold D. (2005). Buddhists, brahmins and belief: Epistemology in South Asian Philosophy of Religion. New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, K., Johnston, E. H., & Kunst, A. (1978). The dialectical method of Nāgārjuna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Candrakīrti. (1992). dBu ma la ‘jugs pa’i shad pa. Sarnath: Kargyud Relief and Protection Committee.

  • Candrakīrti. (2003). dBu ma rtsa ba’i ‘grel pa tshig gsal ba. Sarnath: Gelukpa Student Welfare Committee.

  • Candrakīrti. (2007). In J. Loizzo (Ed.), Nāgārjuna’s Reason Sixty with Candrakīrti’s Reason Sixty Commentary. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Dreyfus G., McClintock S. (2003). The Prāsaṇgika-Svātantrika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Boston: Wisdom Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauré B. (1993). Chan insights and oversights: An epistemological critique of the Chan tradition. Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield J. (1995). Fundamental wisdom of the middle way. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield J. (2002). Empty words. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield J., Priest G. (2002). Nāgārjuna and the limits of thought. In: Garfield J. (eds) Empty words. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 86–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes R. (1994) Nāgārjuna’s appeal. Journal of Indian Philosophy 22: 299–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington C. (1995). A way of reading. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 18, 279–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, C. (2003). In G. Dreyfus & S. McClintock (Eds.), Was Cānrakīrti a Prasaṇgika? (pp. 66–91).

  • Huntington C. (2007). The nature of the Mādhyamika trick. Journal of Indian Philosophy 35, 103–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington C., Wangchen G.N. (1985). The emptiness of emptiness. Honolulu, University of Hawai’i Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, M. (1978). Skillful means: A concept in Mahāyāna buddhism. London: Duckworth.

  • Robinson R.H. (1957). Some logical aspects of Nāgārjuna’s system. Philosophy East and West 6, 291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakchöe, S. (unpublished). The Prāsaṇgika Account of Prāmaṇa. University of Tasmania.

  • Tillemans T. (1999). Scripture, language, logic. Boston, Wisdom Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsong khapa. (2007). Ocean of reasoning. (trans: Samten & Garfield) New York: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay L. Garfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garfield, J.L. Turning a Madhyamaka Trick: Reply to Huntington. J Indian Philos 36, 507–527 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-008-9045-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-008-9045-9

Keywords

Navigation