Skip to main content
Log in

Estrogens and relationship jealousy

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relation between sex hormones and responses to partner infidelity was explored in two studies reported here. The first confirmed the standard sex difference in relationship jealousy, that males (n=133) are relatively more distressed by a partner’s sexual infidelity and females (n=159) by a partner’s emotional infidelity. The study also revealed that females using hormone-based birth control (n=61) tended more toward sexual jealousy than did other females, and reported more intense affective responses to partner infidelity (n=77). In study two, 47 females were assessed four times across one month. Patterns of response to partner infidelity did not vary by week of menstrual cycle, but significant relations between salivary estradiol level and jealousy responses were obtained during the time of rising and high fertility risk. The implications, at least for females, are that any evolved psychological, affective, or behavioral dispositions regarding reproduction-related relationships are potentially moderated by estradiol, and that the use of synthetic hormones may disrupt this relation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellis, M. A., and R. R. Baker 1990 Do Females Promote Sperm Competition? Data for Humans. Animal Behaviour 40:997–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., R. J. Larsen, D. Westen, and J. Semmelroth 1992 Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology. Psychological Science 3:251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., A. Angleitner, V. Oubaid, and D. V. Buss 1996 Sex Differences in Jealousy in Evolutionary and Cultural Perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science 7:359–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavanne, T. J., and G. G. Gallup, Jr. 1998 Variation in Risk Taking Behavior among Female College Students as a Function of the Menstrual Cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior 19:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1989 Mammalian Mating Systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 236:339–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., M. Wilson, and S. J. Weghorst 1982 Male Sexual Jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology 3:11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1871 The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSteno, D. A., and P. Salovey 1996 Evolutionary Origins of Sex Differences in Jealousy? Questioning the “Fitness” of the Model. Psychological Science 7:367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferin, M., R. Jewelewicz, and M. Warren 1993 The Menstrual Cycle: Physiology, Reproductive Disorders, and Infertility. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folstad, I., and A. J. Karter 1992 Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap. American Naturalist 139:603–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., and J. A. Simpson 1990 Toward an Evolutionary History of Female Sociosexual Variation. Journal of Personality 58:69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2000 The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-offs and Strategic Pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:573–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., and R. Thornhill 1998 Menstrual Cycle Variation in Women’s Preferences for the Scent of Symmetrical Men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:927–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., I. Silverman, K. Phillips, and C. Reiber 1997 Activational Hormonal Influences on Abilities and Attitudes: Implications for Evolutionary Theory. Evolution and Cognition 3:191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. 1998 Male, Female: the Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2000 Evolution and Proximate Expression of Human Paternal Investment. Psychological Bulletin 126:55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., and M. V. Flinn 2001 Evolution of Human Parental Behavior and the Human Family. Parenting: Science and Practice 1:5–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., M. Rumsey, C. C. Bow-Thomas, and M. K. Hoard 1995 Sexual Jealousy as a Facultative Trait: Evidence from the Pattern of Sex Differences in Adults from China and the United States. Ethology and Sociobiology 16:355–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. R. 2000 Psychophysiological Responses to Imagined Infidelity: The Specific Innate Modular View of Jealousy Reconsidered. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78:1082–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. R., and N. Christenfeld 1996 Gender, Jealousy, and Reason. Psychological Science 7:364–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. 1999 Sex and Cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laessle, R.G., R. J. Tuschl, U. Schweiger, and K. M. Pirke 1990 Mood Changes and Physical Complaints During the Normal Menstrual Cycle in Healthy Young Women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 15:131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., and D. I. Perrett 2000 Female Preference for Male Faces Changes Cyclically: Further Evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior 21:39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., D. I. Perrett, D. L. Castles, T. Kobayashi, D. M. Burt, L. K. Murray, and R. Minamisawa 1999 Menstrual Cycle Alters Face Preference. Nature 399:741–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., and R. J. Larsen 1997 Facial Asymmetry as an Indicator of Psychological, Emotional, and Physiological Distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:456–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirtcliff, E. A., D. A. Granger, E. B. Schwartz, M. J. Curran, A. Booth, and W. H. Overman 2000 Assessing Estradiol in Biobehavioral Studies Using Saliva and Blood Spots. Simple Radioimmunoassay Protocols, Reliability, and Comparative Validity. Hormones and Behavior 38:137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. 1979 The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and S. W. Gangestad 1999 The Scent of Symmetry: a Human Sex Pheromone That Signals Fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior 20:175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, B. Campbell, ed. Pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind, C., T. Seebeck, F. Bettens, and A. J. Paepke 1995 MHC-dependent Mate Preferences in Humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 260:245–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. W., and E. Kendall 1999 Evolution, Sex, and Jealousy: Investigation with a Sample from Sweden. Evolution and Human Behavior 20:121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox A. J., D. Dunson, and D. D. Baird 2000 The Timing of the “Fertile Window” in the Menstrual Cycle: Day Specific Estimates from a Prospective Study. British Medical Journal 321:1259–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. W. 1994 Dynamics of Human Reproduction: Biology, Biometry, and Demography. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Geary.

Additional information

David C. Geary is the Frederick A. Middlebush Professor of Psychological Sciences at the University of Missouri at Columbia. He has published nearly 100 articles and chapters across a wide range of topics, including cognitive and developmental psychology, education, evolutionary biology, and medicine. His two books, Children’s Mathematical Development (1984) and Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences (1988), have been published by the American Psychological Association.

M. Catherine DeSoto recently completed her Ph.D. in psychological sciences at the University of Missouri at Columbia and is currently assistant professor of psychobiology at the University of Northern Iowa. Her research primarily focuses on the interface between biology and behavior, including the relation between sex hormones and personality disorders.

Mary K. Hoard is completing her Ph.D. studies in psychological sciences at the University of Missouri at Columbia and is currently a research specialist in the Department of Psychological Sciences. Her research interests focus on children’s cognitive development, as well as the relation between sleep and cognitive and psychological functioning.

Melanie Skaggs Sheldon is a graduate student in the Department of Psychological Sciences at the University of Missouri at Columbia. Her research interests include social cooperation, sexual behavior, and personality, as understood from an evolutionary perspective.

M. Lynne Cooper is a professor of psychological sciences and director of the training program in social psychology at the University of Missouri at Columbia. She is an associate editor of the Journal of Personality and the author of more than 60 articles and chapters in the areas of personality and social psychology. Her primary research efforts involve directing a longitudinal study of risky sexual behavior of adolescents and young adults.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geary, D.C., DeSoto, M.C., Hoard, M.K. et al. Estrogens and relationship jealousy. Hum Nat 12, 299–320 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-001-1001-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-001-1001-2

Key words

Navigation