Skip to main content
Log in

Conceivability and Defeasible Modal Justification

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper advances the thesis that we can justifiably believe philosophically interesting possibility statements. The first part of the paper critically discusses van Inwagen’s skeptical arguments while at the same time laying some of the foundation for a positive view. The second part of the paper advances a view of conceivability in terms of imaginability, where imaginging can be propositional, pictorial, or a combination of the two, and argues that conceivability can, and often does, provide us with justified beliefs of what is metaphysically possible. The notion of scenarios is developed, as is an account of how filling out scenarios can uncover a defeater or, in many cases, strengthen the justification for the relevant possibility statement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geirsson, H. Conceivability and Defeasible Modal Justification. Philos Stud 122, 279–304 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-6522-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-6522-9

Keywords

Navigation