Skip to main content

Extensive Questions

From Research Agendas to Interrogative Strategies

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5378))

Abstract

Olsson and his collaborators have proposed an extension of Belief Revision Theory where an epistemic state is modeled as a triple \(S=\langle{\underline{K},E,\underline{A}}\rangle\), where \(\underline{A}\) is a research agenda, i.e. a set of research questions. Contraction and expansion apply to states, and affect the agenda. We propose an alternative characterization of the problem of agenda updating, where research questions are viewed as blueprints for research strategies. We offer a unified solution to this problem, and prove it equivalent to Olsson’s own. We conclude arguing that: (i) our solution makes the idea of ‘minimal change’ in questions and agendas clearer; (ii) can be extended in ways the original theory was not, and may help better realize the aims this theory was proposed for; (iii) unveils some limitations of the initial approach, yet opening a way to overcome them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Olsson, E.J., Westlund, D.: On the Role of Research Agenda in Epistemic Change. Erkenntnis 65, 165–183 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Enqvist, S., Olsson, E.J.: Contraction in Interrogative Belief Revision (March 2008) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Genot, E.J.: The Best of All Possible Worlds: Where Interrogative Games Meet Research Agendas. In: Olsson, E.J. (ed.) Science in Flux. LEUS. Springer, Heidelberg (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Genot, E.J.: The Game of Inquiry. In: LOCCOL 2008 Conference, Prague, September 10–14 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hintikka, J., Halonen, I., Mutanen, A.: Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning. In: Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, pp. 47–90. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hintikka, J.: Socratic Epistemology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansson, S.O.: Belief Contraction without Recovery. Studia Logica 50, 251–260 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Genot, E.J. (2008). Extensive Questions. In: Ramanujam, R., Sarukkai, S. (eds) Logic and Its Applications. ICLA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5378. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92701-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92701-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92700-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92701-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics