Skip to main content
Log in

Biodiversity and biotechnology

  • Published:
Journal of agricultural ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maintenance of biodiversity is urged from many quarters and on grounds ranging from aesthetic considerations to its usefulness, particularly for biotechnology. But regardless of the grounds for preserving biodiversity, writers are generally in agreement that it should be preserved. But, in examining the various references “biodiversity,” such as species diversity, genetic diversity, and habitat diversity, it is apparent that we cannot aim to preserve biodiversityas such, since there are a number of conflicts in any such undertaking. In preserving one aspect of biodiversity, we damage another aspect. Five arguments which attempt to ground our moral concern for biodiversity are reviewed and critiqued, not only for their consistency but also for their power to move us to action. The final section of the paper shows how conflicts in the values of personal and environmental health can impair ethical action and especially policy formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was read at the conference on Agriculture, Food, and Human Values: Tradition and Change, Orlando, Florida, October 7–9, 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

George, K.P. Biodiversity and biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 1, 175–192 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833408

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833408

Keywords

Navigation