Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantum No-Go Theorems and Consciousness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our conscious minds exist in the Universe, therefore they should be identified with physical states that are subject to physical laws. In classical theories of mind, the mental states are identified with brain states that satisfy the deterministic laws of classical mechanics. This approach, however, leads to insurmountable paradoxes such as epiphenomenal minds and illusionary free will. Alternatively, one may identify mental states with quantum states realized within the brain and try to resolve the above paradoxes using the standard Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics. In this essay, we first show that identification of mind states with quantum states within the brain is biologically feasible, and then elaborating on the mathematical proofs of two quantum mechanical no-go theorems, we explain why quantum theory might have profound implications for the scientific understanding of one’s mental states, self identity, beliefs and free will.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alter O, Yamamoto Y (2001) Quantum measurement of a single system. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baianu IC (1971) Organismic supercategories and qualitative dynamics of systems. Bull Math Biophys 33(3):339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baianu IC (2006) Robert Rosen’s work and complex systems biology. Axiomathes 16(1):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baianu IC (2007) Categorical ontology of levels and emergent complexity: an introduction. Axiomathes 17(3):209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baianu IC, Brown R, Glazebrook JF (2007) Categorical ontology of complex spacetime structures: the emergence of life and human consciousness. Axiomathes 17(3):223–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baianu IC, Glazebrook JF, Brown R (2011) Quantum symmetries, operator algebra and quantum groupoid representations: paracrystalline systems, topological order, supersymmetry and global symmetry breaking. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci 9(2):163–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck F, Eccles JC (1992) Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(23):11357–11361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell JS (1966) On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev Mod Phys 38(3):447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bode S, He AH, Soon CS, Trampel R, Turner R, Haynes J-D (2011) Tracking the unconscious generation of free decisions using ultra-high field fMRI. PLoS One 6(6):e21612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born M (1926) Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 37(12):863–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch P (1997) Is the quantum state (an) observable? In: Cohen RS, Horne M, Stachel J (eds) Potentiality, entanglement and passion-at-a-distance: quantum mechanical studies for Abner Shimony, vol 2. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 61–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell JM (1886a) The time taken up by cerebral operations. Parts I–II. Mind 11:220–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell JM (1886b) The time taken up by cerebral operations. Part III. Mind 11:377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell JM (1887) The time taken up by cerebral operations. Part IV. Mind 11:524–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell JM (1890) Mental tests and measurements. Mind 15:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers DJ (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Conscious Stud 2(3):200–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieks D (1982) Communication by EPR devices. Phys Lett A 92:271–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elga A (2004) Defeating Dr. Evil with self-locating belief. Philos Phenomenol Res 69:383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner S (1873) Experimentelle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Processe I Die persönliche Gleichung. Pflügers Archiv Eur J Physiol 7(1):601–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner S (1874) Experimentelle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Processe II Ueber Reflexzeit und Rückenmarksleitung. Pflügers Archiv Eur J Physiol 8(1):526–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner S (1875) Experimentelle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Processe III Der persönlichen Gleichung zweiter Theil. Pflügers Archiv Eur J Physiol 11(1):403–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feser E (2007) Philosophy of mind: a beginner’s guide. Oneworld, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt H (1969) Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. J Philos 66(23):829–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev DD (2004) Consciousness operates beyond the timescale for discerning time intervals: implications for Q-mind theories and analysis of quantum decoherence in brain. Neuroquantology 2(2):122–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev DD (2011) A linkage of mind and brain: Sir John Eccles and modern dualistic interactionism. Biomed Rev 22:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev DD, Glazebrook JF (2006) Dissipationless waves for information transfer in neurobiology—some implications. Informatica (Slovenia) 30(2):221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev DD, Glazebrook JF (2007) Subneuronal processing of information by solitary waves and stochastic processes. In: Lyshevski SE (ed) Nano and molecular electronics handbook. CRC Press, USA, pp 17-1–17-41

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev DD, Glazebrook JF (2012) Quasiparticle tunneling in neurotransmitter release. In: Goddard III WA, Brenner D, Lyshevski SE, Iafrate GJ (eds) Handbook of nanoscience, engineering, and technology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 983–1016

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hassabis D, Chu C, Rees G, Weiskopf N, Molyneux PD, Maguire EA (2009) Decoding neuronal ensembles in the human hippocampus. Curr Biol 19:546–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes JD, Sakai K, Rees G, Gilbert S, Frith C, Passingham RE (2007) Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Curr Biol 17:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg W (1925) Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Physik 33(1):879–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held C (2012) The Kochen–Specker theorem. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, Allen C (eds) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgevoord J, Uffink J (2012) The Uncertainty Principle. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, Allen C (eds) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh IJ, Sherrick Jr CE (1961) Perceived order in different sense modalities. J Exp Psychol 62(5):423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley TH (1874) On the hypothesis that animals are automata, and its history. Fortn Rev 16:555–580

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1879) Are we automata? Mind 4(13):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Holt, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kanabus M, Szelag E, Rojek E, Pöppel E (2002) Temporal order judgement for auditory and visual stimuli. Acta Neurobiol Exp 62(4):263–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay KN, Naselaris T, Prenger RJ, Gallant JL (2008) Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature 452:352–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch C, Hepp K (2006) Quantum mechanics in the brain. Nature 440:611–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochen SB, Specker EP (1967) The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J Math Mech 17(1):59–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis PJ (2006) Conspiracy theories of quantum mechanics. Br J Philos Sci 57(2):359–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrone J (2003) Quantum mind. Lancet Neurol 2:450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83(4):435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson ET (2012) Personal Identity. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, Allen C (eds) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pati AK, Braunstein SL (2000) Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state. Nature 404:164–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose R (1989) The emperor’s new mind: concerning computers, minds and the laws of physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitowsky I (2005) Quantum mechanics as a theory of probability. In: Demopoulos W, Pitowsky I (eds) Festschrift for Jeffrey Bub. Kluwer, Dordrecht. http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0510095

  • Pöppel E (1997) A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends Cogn Sci 1(2):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (2002) The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR, Eccles JC (1984) The self and its brain: an argument for interactionism. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson W (2012) Epiphenomenalism. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, Allen C (eds) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger E (1926) An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules. Phys Rev 28(6):1049–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seife C (2000) Cold numbers unmake the quantum mind. Science 287(5454):791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (2011) Taking aim at free will. Nature 477(7362):23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soon CS, Brass M, Heinze H-J, Haynes J-D (2008) Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nat Neurosci 11(5):543–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind L (2012) The theoretical minimum: quantum mechanics. Stanford Continuing Studies. Stanford. http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL701CD168D02FF56F

  • Tegmark M (2000) Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Phys Rev E 61(4):4194–4206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedral V, Plenio MB (1998) Basics of quantum computation. Prog Quantum Electron 22:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner DM (2002) The illusion of conscious will. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner E (1961) Remarks on the mind–body problem. In: Good IJ (ed) The scientist speculates. Heinemann, London, pp 284–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootters WK, Zurek WH (1982) A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299:802–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu S, Nikolić D (2011) Quantum mechanics needs no consciousness. Annalen der Physik 523(11):931–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan

    Danko Georgiev

Authors
  1. Danko Georgiev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danko Georgiev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgiev, D. Quantum No-Go Theorems and Consciousness. Axiomathes 23, 683–695 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-012-9204-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-012-9204-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation