Skip to main content
Log in

The Contingency of Business: Narrative, Metaphor, and Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss rival views of business and business ethics in terms of narrative. I want to show that we can tell various stories about business, and that our worldview narratives shape our accounts of business. These narratives not only involve description, but contain normative ramifications. We can only act within the world that we perceive. To evaluate competing narratives, I suggest dialectical comparison of the narratives with important values. The second part of the paper discusses five distinct genres of worldview narratives and their implications for business: homo economicus, libertarian, conservative, liberal, and religio-philosophical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carnegie, A.: 1906, ‘The Gospel of Wealth’, The Gospel of Wealth, and Other Timely Essays (Doubleday, Page, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, P.: 1965, ‘Morals and the Criminal Law’, The Enforcement of Morals (Oxford University Press, Oxford); reprinted in Wasserstrom, R.A.: 1971, Morality and the Law (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C.: 1892, Great Expectations, in The Complete Works of Charles Dickens (G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt Jr., H. T.: 1986, The Foundations of Bioethics (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A.: 1988, The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. and D. R. Gilbert Jr.: 1988, Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1962, 1982, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert Jr., D. R.: 1992, The Twilight of Corporate Strategy: A Comparative Ethical Critique (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. M.: 1994, The Ethical Manager: A New Method for Business Ethics (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II: 1991, Centesimus Annus (United States Catholic Conference, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauerwas, S.M.: 1983, The Peaceable Kingdom: A Primer in Christian Ethics (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • London, J.: 1903, The Call of the Wild (Grosset & Dunlap, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue (2nd ed.) (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R.: 1991 (March 21), ‘“Fetal Protection” Plan Rule Biased’, The Washington Post, A1.

  • McCloskey, D. N.: 1990, If You're So Smart: The Narrative of Economic Expertise (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrory, M.: 1994 (March 22), ‘The Business of Human Rights’, The Washington Post, A2.

  • Mitroff, I. and H. Linstone: 1993, The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G.: 1986, Images of Organization (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, M.: 1982, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism (Simon & Schuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D.: 1992, Ishmael (Bantam/Turner, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, A.: 1961, The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism (Signet, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P.: 1981, Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action, and Interpretation, ed. and tr. John B. Thompson (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1989, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M.: 1990, The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization (Doubleday/ Currency, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: 1982, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie, The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith (Liberty Classics, Indianapolis, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C.: 1992, Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, J.: 1988, Ethics After Babel (Beacon Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • The New Yorker: 1995 ( June 12), ‘Fighting Words’, 35–37.

  • Tompkins, D. et al.: 1993 (Sept.-Oct.), ‘The Business of Business? The Meaning, Limits, and Promise of Socially Responsible Business’, The Utne Reader.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Randels, G.D. The Contingency of Business: Narrative, Metaphor, and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1299–1310 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005837615070

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005837615070

Keywords

Navigation