Skip to main content
Log in

Liar, Reducibility and Language

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

First, language and axioms of Church's paper 'Comparison of Russell's Resolution of the Semantical Antinomies with that of Tarski' are slightly modified and a version of the Liar paradox tentatively reconstructed. An obvious natural solution of the paradox leads to a hierarchy of truth predicates which is of a different kind from the one defined by Church: it depends on the enlargement of the semantical vocabulary and its levels do not differ in the ramified-type-theoretical sense. Second, two attempts are made in order to justify the Russellian, and perhaps Churchian, idea that language should not be fragmented beyond what is required by type distinctions. After all, because of reducibility, which seems to allow a semantics without propositions, this comes out to be possible only at the cost of resorting to two disputable theses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, C. A.: 1989, 'Russellian Intensional Logic', in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 67-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.: 1976, 'Comparison of Russell's Resolution of the Semantical Antinomies with that of Tarski', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 41, 747-760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.: 1984, 'Russell's Theory of Identity of Propositions', Philosophia Naturalis 21, 513-522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N.: 1980, 'The Development of the Theory of Logical Types and the Notion of Logical Subject in Russell's Early Philosophy', Synthese 45, 71-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N.: 1986, 'Frege, Russell, and Logicism: A Logical Reconstruction', in L. Haaparanta and J. Hintikka (eds.), Frege Synthesized, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 197-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, W. D.: 1989, 'Russell's Reasons for Ramification', in C. W. Savage and C. A. Anderson (eds.), Rereading Russell: Essays in Russell's Metaphysics and Epistemology, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 22-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, P.: 1990, 'Logic in Russell's Logicism', in D. Bell and N. Cooper (eds.), The Analytic Tradition, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 137-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, P.: 1993, 'Functions and Propositional Functions in Principia Mathematica', in A. D. Irvine and C. A. Wedeking (eds.), Russell and Analitic Philosophy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 342-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landini, G.: 1993, 'Reconciling PM's Ramified Type Theory with the Doctrine of the Unrestricted Variable of the Principles', in A. D. Irvine and C. A. Wedeking (eds.), Russell and Analitic Philosophy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 361-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, E.: forthcoming, 'Russellian Type Theory and Semantical Paradoxes, to appear in C. A. Anderson and M. Zeleny (eds), Logic, Meaning and Computation: Essays in Memory of Alonzo Church, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

  • Myhill, J.: 1979, 'A Refutation of an Unjustified Attack on the Axiom of Reducibility', in G. W. Roberts (ed.), Bertrand Russell Memorial Volume, Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 81-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, D.: 1983, 'Russell's 1913 Theory of Knowledge Manuscript', in C. W. Savage and C. A. Anderson (eds.), Rereading Russell: Essays in Russell's Metaphysics and Epistemology, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 169-182

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1903, The Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1908, 'Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types', American Journal of Mathematics, 30, reprinted in R. C. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge, Allen and Unwin, London 1956, pp. 59–102.

  • Russell, B.: 1910, Principia Mathematica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1910–11, 'Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11, 108-28, reprinted in B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1912, The Problems of Philosophy, London, Oxford University Press, reprinted by Hackett Pub. Co., Indianapolis 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1913, 'Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript', in E. R. Eames and K. Blackwell, K. (eds.), The collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 7, Allen and Unwin, London 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1914, Our Knowledge of the External World, Allen and Unwin, 2nd ed., London 1926.

  • Russell, B.: 1918–19, 'The Philosophy of Logical Atomism', The Monist 28, 495-527; 29, 32–63, 190–222, 345–80, reprinted in R. C. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge, Allen and Unwin, London 1956, pp. 177–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, R. M.: 1979, Russell, Routledge and Kegan, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giaretta, P. Liar, Reducibility and Language. Synthese 117, 355–374 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005076008996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005076008996

Keywords

Navigation