Skip to main content
Log in

Evo-Devo, Devo-Evo, and Devgen-Popgen

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behe, M.J.: 1996, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlund, H.: 2002, ‘Pancreatic Organogenesis - Developmental Mechanisms and Implications for Therapy’, Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 524–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.F.: 1994, ‘Dobzhansky, Waddington and Schmalhausen: Embryology and the Modern Synthesis’, in M.B. Adams (ed.), The Evolution of Theodosius Dobzhansky: Essays on His Life and Thought in Russia and America, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.F.: 2000, Developmental Biology (6th edn.), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.F.: 2001, ‘Ecological Developmental Biology: Developmental Biology Meets the Real World’, Developmental Biology 233, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.F., Opitz, J. and Raff, R.A.: 1996, ‘Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology’, Developmental Biology 173, 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.F. and Sarkar, S.: 2000, ‘Embracing Complexity: Organicism for the Twenty-First Century’, Developmental Dynamics 219, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.F. and Bolker, J.A.: 2003, ‘Special Issue: Ecological Developmental Biology’, Evolution and Development 5(1).

  • Goldschmidt, R.B.: 1940, TheMaterial Basis of Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.: 1994, How the Leopard Changed its Spots, Scribner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R.: 1992, ‘Death of the Gene: Developmental Systems Strike Back’, in P.E. Griffiths (ed.), Trees of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 165–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K.: 1996, ‘Evolutionary Developmental Biology’, McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science and Technology, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 110–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K.: 1999, Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K.: 2000, ‘Guest Editorial: Evo-Devo or Devo-Evo - Does it Matter?’, Evolution and Development 2, 177–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K.: 2003, ‘Opening the Black Box between Genotype and Phenotype: Cells and cell Condensations as Fundamental Units of Evolutionary Developmental Biology’, Biology and Philosophy (this issue).

  • Holtzer, H.: 1968, ‘Induction of Chondrogenesis. A Concept in Terms of Mechanisms’, in R. Glieschmajer and R.E. Billingham (eds), Epithelial-mesenchymal Interactions, William and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 152–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F.: 2000, The Century of the Gene, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S.A.: 2003, ‘From Physics to Development: The Evolution of Morphogenetic Mechanisms’, in G.B. Müller and S.A. Newman (eds), Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 221–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opitz, J.M. and Gilbert, S.F.: 1993, ‘Developmental Field Theory and the Molecular Analysis of Morphogenesis: A Comment on Dr. Slavkin’s Observations’, American Journal of Medical Genetics 47, 687–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S.: 2000, The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution (revised edn.), Duke University Press, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, R.A.: 1996, The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, J.S., Hall, B.K. and Olson, W.M.: 2001, ‘Bridging the Gap between Developmental Systems Theory and Evolutionary Developmental Biology’, BioEssays 23, 954–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, H. and Schotté, O.: 1932, ‘Ñber xenoplastiche Transplantation als Mittel zur Analyse der embryonalen Induktion’, Naturwissenschaften 20, 463–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Weele, C.: 1999, Images of Development: Environmental Causes in Ontogeny, SUNY Press, NY, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H.: 1975, The Evolution of an Evolutionist, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G.P.: 2000, ‘What is the Promise of Developmental Evolution? Part I: Why is Developmental Biology Necessary to Explain Evolutionary Innovations?’, Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular Development and Evolution) 288, 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, T. Pfaff, S.L., Edlund, T. and Jessell, T.M.: 1993, ‘Control of Cell Pattern in the Neural Tube: Motor Neuron Induction by Diffusible Factors from Notochord and Floor Plate’, Cell 73, 673–686.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, S.F. Evo-Devo, Devo-Evo, and Devgen-Popgen. Biology & Philosophy 18, 347–352 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023944304419

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023944304419

Navigation