Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 9, 2022

(How) Are Friends and Friendship Worthwhile to the Advanced Epicurean?

  • Alex Gillham EMAIL logo
From the journal Rhizomata

Abstract

Commentators usually understand the Epicureans to take friends and friendship to be worthwhile because they help us to eliminate and/or manage our bodily and/or mental pains and thus come closer to achieving tranquility. However, this understanding leaves unexplained why friends and friendship might be worthwhile to an advanced Epicurean with few or no pains to manage or eliminate. In this paper, I remedy this deficiency by offering three explanations for why friends and friendship could and maybe would remain worthwhile even to the Epicurean who achieves tranquility. Along the way, I explore some problems with each explanation and consider ways to overcome them. Notwithstanding these problems, I conclude that friends and friendship could and perhaps would be worthwhile even to the Epicurean with few or no pains.

Bibliography

Alwood, Andrew (2018): “Epicurean Hedonism as Qualitative Hedonism”, Journal of Value Inquiry 52. No. 4: pp. 411–27.10.1007/s10790-017-9623-8Search in Google Scholar

Angeli, Anna (1988): Filodemo: Agli amici di scuola. Naples: Bibliopolis,Search in Google Scholar

Annas, Julia (1993): The Morality of Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195096525.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Arenson, Kelly (2019): Health and Hedonism in Plato and Epicurus. New York: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350080287Search in Google Scholar

Arrighetti, Graziano (1978): “Philia e Physiologia: i fondamenti dell’amicizia epicurea”, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 1: pp. 49–63.10.2307/40235706Search in Google Scholar

– (1973): Epicuro: Opere. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, Emily A. (2012): “Epicurus and the Politics of Fearing Death”, Apeiron 45. No. 2: pp. 109–129.10.1515/apeiron-2011-0003Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, Cyril (1964): The Greek Atomists and Epicurus. New York: Russell and Russell.Search in Google Scholar

– (1926): Epicurus: The Extant Remains. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Bignone, Ettore (1973): L’Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro, Vol. 1. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Eric (2009): “Politics and Society”. In: James Warren (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–96.10.1017/CCOL9780521873475.011Search in Google Scholar

– (2002): “Epicurus on the Value of Friendship (Sententia Vatican 23)”, Classical Philology 97. No. 1: pp. 68–80.Search in Google Scholar

– (1998): “Epicurus, Sententia Vaticana XXIII”, The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 259.Search in Google Scholar

Carnes, Thomas (2021): “Keeping the Friend in Epicurean Friendship”, Apeiron 54. No. 4: pp. 1–39.10.1515/apeiron-2020-0002Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, John M (2012): Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691138602.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

– (1999): Reason and Emotion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Diano, Carlo (1943): “NOTE EPICUREE”, Annali della R. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Lettere, storia e filosofia Serie II, 12. No. 3: pp. 111–23.Search in Google Scholar

Erbì, Margherita (2020): Epicuro: Lettere. Frammenti e testimonianze. Pisa-Roma: Fabrizio Serra.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Matt (2004): “Can Epicureans Be Friends?”, Ancient Philosophy 24. No. 2: pp. 407–24.10.5840/ancientphil200424250Search in Google Scholar

Gillham, Alex R (2021a): “Classifying the Epicurean Goods”, Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 77. No. 1: pp. 47–70.10.17990/RPF/2021_77_1_0047Search in Google Scholar

– (2021b): “Expressing Tranquility”, Forum Philosophicum International Journal for Philosophy 26. No. 1: pp. 143–62.10.35765/forphil.2021.2601.09Search in Google Scholar

Inwood, Brad and Lloyd Gerson (1994): The Epicurus Reader. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

Long, A.A (2006): “Pleasure and Social Utility: The Virtues of Being Epicurean”. In: A.A. Long (ed.): From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–201.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279128.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Long, A.A and Sedley, D.N. (1987): The Hellenistic Philosophers. Volume I: Translations of the Principal Sources, with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mitsis, Phillip (1989): Epicurus’ Ethical Theory: The Pleasures of Invulnerability. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9780801466885Search in Google Scholar

Nikolsky, Boris (2001): “Epicurus on Pleasure”, Phronesis 46. No. 4: pp. 440–65.10.1163/156852801753736490Search in Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Timothy (2010): Epicureanism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

– (2001): “Is Epicurean Friendship Altruistic?”, Apeiron 34. No. 4: pp. 269–305.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, James L. (2003): “Epicurean Attachments: Life, Pleasure, Beauty, Friendship and Piety”, Cronache Ercolonesi 33: pp. 205–27.Search in Google Scholar

Purinton, Jeffrey (1993): “Epicurus on the Telos”, Phronesis 38. No. 3: pp. 281–320.10.1163/156852893321052316Search in Google Scholar

Rist, John (1972): Epicurus: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, Benjamin (2017): “Squaring the Epicurean Circle: Friendship and Happiness in the Garden”, Ancient Philosophy Vol. 37. No. 1: pp. 153–68.10.5840/ancientphil20173718Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, David (1998): “The Inferential Foundations of Epicurean Ethics”. In: Stephen Everson (ed.): Ethics: Companions to Ancient Thought, Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–50.10.1017/CBO9781139166348.006Search in Google Scholar

Striker, Gisela (1989): “Epicurean Hedonism”. In: Jacques Brunschwig and Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.): Passions & Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind: Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–18.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, James (2014): The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle, and the Hellenistic Hedonists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139178976Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Raphael (2009): “Pleasure and Desire”. In: James Warren (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 158–78.10.1017/CCOL9780521873475.010Search in Google Scholar

– (2004): “What Kind of Hedonist Was Epicurus?”, Phronesis 49. No. 4: pp. 303–22.Search in Google Scholar

Wotke, Karl and Hermann Usener (1888): “Epikureische Spruchsammlung”, Wiener Studien X: pp. 175–201.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-08-09
Published in Print: 2022-08-04

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/rhiz-2022-0005/html
Scroll to top button