Abstract
In World Poverty and Human Rights, Thomas Pogge argues that the “global rich” have a duty to eradicate severe poverty in the world. The novelty of Pogge’s approach is to present this demand as stemming from basic commands which are negative rather than positive in nature: the global rich have an obligation to eradicate the radical poverty of the “global poor” not because of a norm of beneficence asking them to help those in need when they can at little cost to themselves, but because of their having violated a principle of justice not to unduly harm others by imposing on them a coercive global order that makes their access to the objects of their human right to subsistence insecure. In this paper, I claim that although Pogge is right in arguing that negative duties are crucial in an account of global justice, he is wrong in saying that they are the only ones that are crucial. Harming the global poor by causing their poverty provides a sufficient but not a necessary condition for the global rich to have a duty of justice to assist them. After engaging in a critical analysis of Pogge’s argument, I conclude by suggesting the need for a robust conception of cosmopolitan solidarity that includes positive duties of assistance which are not mere duties of charity, but enforceable ones of justice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beitz, C.R., International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought, World Politics 51(2) (1999), pp. 269–296.
Fleisch, B., Book Review, Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6(4) (2003), pp. 455–458.
Herman, B., The Scope of Moral Requirement, Philosophy & Public Affairs 30(3) (2002), pp. 227–256.
Kant, I., in M.J. Gregor (ed. and Trans.), Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
LaFollette, H., Book Review: Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights, Ethics 113(4) (2003), pp. 907–911.
Miller, D., Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
O’Neill, O., Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Orend, B., Human Rights. Concept and Context. Ontario: Broadview Press, 2002.
Pogge, T.W., World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, 2nd Ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Shue, H., Basic Rights. Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd Ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Shue, H., Thickening Convergence: Human Rights and Cultural Diversity, in D.K. Chatterjee (ed.), The Ethics of Assistance. Morality and the Distant Needy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 217–241.
Singer, P., Famine, Affluence and Morality, Philosophy & Public Affairs 1(3) (1972), pp.~229–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilabert, P. The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative?. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 7, 537–550 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-6489-9
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-6489-9