Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the hermeneutic fore-structure of scientific research

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper provides an overview of the hermeneutic and phenomenological context from which the idea of a “constitutional analysis” of science originated. It analyzes why the approach to “hermeneutic fore-structure of scientific research” requires to transcend the distinction between the context of justification and the context of discovery. By incorporating this approach into an integral “postmetaphysical philosophy of science”, I argue that one can avoid the radical empiricism of recent science studies, while also preventing the analysis of science's discursive practices from collapsing into the frames of radical anti-epistemological critique mandated by some hermeneutic philosophers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Apel, K.-O. 1968. “Szientistik, Hermeneutik, Ideologiekritik”, Wiener Jahrbuch für Philosophie 1: 15–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K.-O. 1977. “Types of Social Science in the Light of Human Interests of Knowledge”, Social Research 44: 425–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. and D. Bloor. 1982. “Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge”, in M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua, F. and E. Giannetto. 1995. “Hermeneutics and Science Education: The Role of History of Science”, Science and Education 4: 115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. 1989. The Rational and the Social. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1992. Making Science: Between Nature and Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crease, R. 1995. The Play of Nature. Bloomington IN: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M. 1995. “Alternative Interpretations, History and Experiment”, Science and Education 4: 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1998. “On the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Its Philosophical Agenda”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 239–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. 1993. Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents, New York, London: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. “Reflections on My Philosophical Journey”, in L.E. Halin (ed.), The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 3–63.

  • Ginev, D. 1997a. A Passage to a Hermeneutic Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginev, D. 1997b. Essays in the Hermeneutics of Science, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginev, D. 1998. “Rhetoric and Double Hermeneutics in the Human Sciences”, Human Studies 21: 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P. 1997a. “Why a Hermeneutical Philosophy of the Natural Sciences?”, Man and World 30: 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P. 1997b. “Context, Hermeneutics, and Ontology in the Experimental Sciences”, in D. Ginev and R.S. Cohen (eds.), Issues and Images in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time, trans. by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson). San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herfel, W. and C. Hooker. 1997, “Cognitive Dynamics and the Development of Science”, in D. Ginev and R.S. Cohen (eds.), Issues and Images in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 127–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyningen-Huene, P. 1987. “Context of Discovery and Context of Justification”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18: 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janich, P. 1997. “Methodical Constructivism”, in D. Ginev and R.S. Cohen (eds.), Issues and Images in the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. 1970. “Bayes's Theorem. and the History of Science”, in R.H. Stuewer, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 31–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D. 1984. Reason and the Search of Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. 1995. “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge”, Annual Review of Sociology 21: 289–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. 1988. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Culturology, Department of Philosophy, University of Sophia, Ruski 15 Str., Sophia, 1000, Bulgaria

    Dimitri Ginev

Authors
  1. Dimitri Ginev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginev, D. On the hermeneutic fore-structure of scientific research. Continental Philosophy Review 32, 143–168 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006966329046

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006966329046

Keywords

Search

Navigation