Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The “science — methodology” iterative cycle

An analysis of A. Polikarov's methodological views

  • Diskussion
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Asarja Polikarov ist die führende Gestalt in der Wissenschaftsmethodologie Bulgariens und einer der bedeutendsten Vertreter dieses Faches innerhalb des marxistischen Denkens. Der vorliegende Artikel ist der Analyse seiner Leitideen gewidmet: Dem Charakter des Verhältnisses zwischen Wissenschaft und Methodologie, der Konzeption des Multimethodologismus, der Untersuchung der Wertigkeit methodologischer Systeme, der Proliferation physikalischer Theorien usw.

Das Ziel der Analyse besteht darin, die Stellung der Ansichten Polikarovs in Beziehung auf die weltweiten Tendenzen gegenwärtiger Wissenschaftsmethodologie aufzuweisen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Cf. Toulmin, S.Human Understanding vol. 1, Oxford, 1972, p. 501.

  2. Cf. Radnitzky, G.Contemporary Scools of Metascience, Göteborg, 1970.

  3. Cf. McMullin, E. “The History and Philosophy of Science: A Taxonomy”,Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5, R. H. Stuewer (ed.), Minneapolis, 1970.

  4. Polikarov, A.Methodological Problems of Science, Sofia, 1983, p. 10.

  5. Ibidem, p. 275.

  6. Ibidem, p. 62.

  7. Cf. Sarkar, H. “A Theory of Group Rationality”,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 13, No. 1, 1982.

  8. Cf. Masterman, M. “The Nature of Paradigm”,Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, I. Lakatos — A. Musgrave (eds.), Cambridge, 1970, pp. 73–74.

  9. Cf. Sarkar, H.op. cit., pp. 62–65.

  10. Cf. Lakatos, I. “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions”,Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VIII, R. Buck — R. Cohen (eds.), 1970.

  11. Polikarov, A.Problems of Scientific Knowledge from a Methodological Point of View, (in Bulgarian), Sofia, 1977, ch. 3.

  12. Polikarov, A.Methodological Problems of Science, pp. 111–112.

  13. Cf. Ginev, D. “Comparative Analysis of Scientific Knowledge”,Epistemologia, (in print); Ginev, D. “Towards a comparative analysis of scientific knowledge”,Abstracts of 7th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, Salzburg, 1983.

  14. Cf. Polikarov, A.Methodological Problems of Science, p. 72.

  15. Polikarov, A. “The Proliferation and Synthesis of Physical Theories”,Epistemologia, IV, (1981), p. 441.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibidem, p. 451.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cf. Polikarov, A. “Overturn and Continuity of the Hypotheses in the Framing of the Theory of Relativity”,Einstein Symposium Berlin. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 100, H. Nelkowski et al. Berlin, 1979.

  18. Cf. Polikarov, A. “Strukturmodelle der wissenschaftlichen Entwicklung”,Naturbeschreibung und Naturerklärung, F. Rapp (Hrsg.), München, 1981.

  19. Cf. Polikarov, A.Methodological Problems of Science, ch. 14.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Art, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Benkovskistr. 3, 1000, Sofia, Bulgaria

    Dimíter Ginev

Authors
  1. Dimíter Ginev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginev, D. The “science — methodology” iterative cycle. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17, 143–153 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801121

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801121

Keywords

Search

Navigation