Abstract
The analogy between science and theater work is so strict as to be normally taken for granted without the need of further specification. This implies that the analogy is completely ignored. Here I try to go in depth into the character of this analogy and to demonstrate how stopping and thinking about this issue could give some useful hints for solving problems that contemporary science is experiencing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey J, Ford C (1994) Of methods and metaphors: theater and self-exploration in Laboratory. J Appl Behav Sci 30(4):381–396
Coleridge ST (1912) Poetical works. McGraw Hill, New York
Florenskij P (1916) Ai miei figli (Italian Trans: Mondadori, Milano 2005)
Galluzzi P (2001) Scienziati a corte: l’arte della sperimentazione nell’Accademia Galileiana del Cimento: 1657–1667. Sillabe Editore, Firenze
Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2(8):e124
O’Rourke K (2007) An historical perspective on meta-analysis: dealing quantitatively with varying study results. J R Soc Med 100(12):579–582
Rzhetsky A, Iossifov I, Loh JM, White K (2006) Microparadigms: chains of collective reasoning in publications about molecular interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 13(103):4940–4945
Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor should not be used to evaluate research. Br Med J 314:497
Young K (1998) Yeast two-hybrid: so many interactions, (in) so little time. Biol Reprod 58(2):302–311
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giuliani, A. Science as Theater: Too Obvious to Be Appreciated. Topoi 30, 165–171 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-011-9097-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-011-9097-4