Psychological Capital and Work Engagement: The Moderating Role of Age Diversity



Alice S.M. Gleichmann(1*), Arum Etikariena(2),

(1) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Psychology Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Work engagement to private sector workers during the Covid-19 pandemic has been stationary or experienced a decline.  One of the antecedents of work engagement is personal resources construct. One derives personal resources construct is psychological capital based on the Job Demand Resources (JD- R) model. This research aims to prove the moderating role of age diversity to private sector workers in connection between psychological capital and work engagement referring to the theory of “Conservation of Resource” (COR). This research involves 127 Jabodetabek employees that works in private sectors. The measuring instrument used is Utrecht Work Engagement scale (UWES)-9, Psychological Capital Questionaire (PCQ-24) and age diversity that is categorized in 4 groups. The result of the research shows that there is a significant positive connection between psychological capital and work engagement of private sector employees.  In other side, age diversity does not have a moderation effect, there is insignificant interaction effect between psychological capital and age diversity to work engagement, who the majority of participants in this study have already led to the stage of maintaining (age 41- 60 years old). With regard to the second most participants entering the advancement stage (ages 27–40 years old). In addition, this research proves employee who has high psychological capital; resulting in an increase of work engagement

Full Text:

PDF (English)

References


Amuzu, C.S (2017). Engaging the Workforce : Baby Boomers , Generation Xers and Millennials Dissertation Manuscript Submitted to Northcentral University Graduate Faculty of the School of Business in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOP.

Bakker, A. B., & Van Woerkom, M. (2018). Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology, 59(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000120

Chai, D. S., Luo, W., & Dirani, K. (2016). THE IMPACT OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL AND PERCEIVED SUPPORT ON WORK PERFORMANCE OF KOREAN EXPATRIATES: THE MEDIATING EFFECTS OF CROSS-CULTURAL ADJUSTMENT AND WORK ENGAGEMENT A Dissertation.

Chaudhary, R., & Rangnekar, S. (2017). Socio-demographic Factors, Contextual Factors, and Work Engagement: Evidence from India. Emerging Economy Studies, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394901517696646

Cohen, R. J. & Swerdik, E.M. (2018). Psychologocal Testing & Assesment : An Introduction to test and Measurement. (9th ed). New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill.

Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. In Academy of Management Annals (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099

Cummings, T. (2015). Organization Development and Change. In Dynamics of Organizational Change and Learning (Vol. 10). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753408.ch2

Da, S., He, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Effectiveness of psychological capital intervention and its influence on work-related attitudes: Daily online self-learning method and randomized controlled trial design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238754

Gravetter, F. & Forzano, LAB. (2016). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.

Grover, S. L., Teo, S. T. T., Pick, D., Roche, M., & Newton, C. J. (2018). Psychological capital as a personal resource in the JD-R model. Personnel Review, 47(4), 968–984. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2016-0213

Harter, J. (2021). US Employee Engagement Reverts back to Pre Covid 19 Levels. Gallup https://www.gallup.com/workplace/321965/employee-engagement-reverts-back-pre-covid-levels.aspx.

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. In the Guilford Press (Vol. 46, Issue 3).

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513

Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. In Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (Vol. 5). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

Kahn, W. A. (1990). PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/256287

Kumar, R. (2018). Research Methodology: A step by step guide for beginners (5th ed), California: Sage Publication, Inc.

Kuok, A. C. H., & Taormina, R. J. (2017). Work engagement: Evolution of the concept and a new inventory. Psychological Thought, 10(2), 262–287. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i2.236

Liu, D., Chen, Y., & Li, N. (2021). Tackling the negative impact of COVID-19 on work engagement and taking charge: A multi-study investigation of frontline health workers. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000866

Luthans, F. ;, Avolio, B. J. ;, Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFO. In Personnel Psychology; Autumn (Vol. 60).

Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge.

Meyers, M. C., Kooij, D., Kroon, B., de Reuver, R., & van Woerkom, M. (2020). Organizational Support for Strengths Use, Work Engagement, and Contextual Performance: The Moderating Role of Age. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(2), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9702-4

Qatrunnada, R.Z. (2019). Interactional Justice, Perceived Organizational Support & Work Engagement: The Effect of WeCare4Share Program in Increasing Interactional Justice For R &A Department PT X. Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia.

Rožman, M., Treven, S., & Čančer, V. (2020). The impact of promoting intergenerational synergy on the work engagement of older employees in Slovenia. Journal of East European Management Studies, 25(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2020-1-9

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Shepherd, W.J., Ployhart, R.E., & Strizver, S.D. (2021). Supplemental Material for The COVID-19 Pandemic and New Hire Engagement: Relationships With Unemployment Rates, State Restrictions, and Organizational Tenure. (2021). Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000917.supp

Sousa, I. C., Ramos, S., & Carvalho, H. (2020). Retaining an age-diverse workforce through HRM: The mediation of work engagement and affective commitment. German Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220979797

Suryadiningrat, F. (2017). Relationship between Extraversion and Conscientiousness to the Work-Life Balances with Psychological Capital as a Mediator in The Women’s Officer. Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia.

Theil. (2018). Purposeful_Goal_Striving_Using theory of purposeful of work behavior to explain work engagement. ProQuest, LLC.

Vasandhani. (2018). Psychological_Capital_and_Work engagement. Published by Proquest LLC

Wolter, C., Santa Maria, A., Gusy, B., Lesener, T., Kleiber, D., & Renneberg, B. (2019). Social support and work engagement in police work: The mediating role of work–privacy conflict and self-efficacy. Policing, 42(6), 1022–1037. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-10-2018-0154

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121

Xu, J., Liu, Y., & Chung, B. (2017). Leader psychological capital and employee work engagement: The roles of employee psychological capital and team collectivism. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(7), 969–985. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2016-0126

Yang, J., & Matz-Costa, C. (2018). Age Diversity in the Workplace: The Effect of Relational Age Within Supervisor–Employee Dyads on Employees’ Work Engagement. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 87(2), 156–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415017709798

Yin, N. (2018). The influencing outcomes of job engagement: an interpretation from the social exchange theory. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(5), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2017-0054

Yuan, Z., Ye, Z., & Zhong, M. (2021). Plug back into work, safely: Job reattachment, leader safety commitment, and job engagement in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000860




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26539/pcr.32709

Article Metrics

Abstract Views : 684 | PDF Views : 430

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Alice S.M. Gleichmann, Arum Etikariena

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 Publisher:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Unit Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling (UPBK) | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm. 


 Creative Commons License
Psychocentrum Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



View My Stats