Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:18:12.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanatory Symmetries, Preformation, and Developmental Systems Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Godfrey-Smith
Peter Godfrey-Smith*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305–2155.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some central ideas associated with developmental systems theory (DST) are outlined for non-specialists. These ideas concern the nature of biological development, the alleged distinction between “genetic” and “environmental” traits, the relations between organism and environment, and evolutionary processes. I also discuss some criticisms of the DST approach.

Type
Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000 , 2000 , pp. S322 - S331
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

This paper was written to introduce a session on DST at the 1998 PSA meetings. I would like to thank all those present at the PSA session, and also Richard Francis and Kritika Yegnashankaran, for helpful comments.

References

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2000), “On the Theoretical Role of Genetic Coding”, Philosophy of Science 67, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, R. (1992), “The Death of the Gene”, in Griffiths, P. (ed.), Trees of Life: Essays in Philosophy of Biology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 165–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. and Gray, R. (1994). “Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation”, Journal of Philosophy 91: 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M. (1995), Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. S. (forthcoming), “Battling the Undead: How (and How Not) to Resist Genetic Determinism”, in Singh, R., Krimbas, C., Paul, D., and Beatty, J. (eds.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levins, R. and Lewontin, R. C. (1985), The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1974). “The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Cause”, reprinted in Levins and Lewontin 1985, 109–122.Google Scholar
Olby, R. (1994), The Path to the Double Helix (enlarged edition). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1985), The Ontogeny of Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P. (1999), Sex and Death: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Biology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K., Smith, K., and Dickison, M. (1996), “The Extended Replicator”, Biology and Philosophy 11: 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar