Skip to main content
Log in

Defining “quality of care” persuasively

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the quality movement in health care now enters its fourth decade, the language of quality is ubiquitous. Practitioners, organizations, and government agencies alike vociferously testify their commitments to quality and accept numerous forms of governance aimed at improving quality of care. Remarkably, the powerful phrase “quality of care” is rarely defined in the health care literature. Instead it operates as an accepted and assumed goal worth pursuing. The status of evidence-based medicine, for instance, hinges on its ability to improve quality of care, and efforts are made by both proponents and detractors to unpack the contents and outcomes of evidence-based practice while the contents of “quality of care” are presumed to be understood. Because the goals of medicine are far from obvious, this paper investigates the neglected term, “quality of care,” in an effort to understand what it is that health care practices are so uncritically assumed to be striving for. Finding lack of consensus on the terminology in the quality literature, I propose that the term operates rhetorically by way of persuasive appeal (and lack of descriptive meaning). Unsatisfied that “quality of care” operates as a mere buzzword in morally contentious debates over resource allocation and duties of care, I implore health care communities to go beyond mere commitments to quality and, instead, to focus attention on the difficult task of specifying what counts as quality care within an economically constrained health care system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Total quality management (TQM) is a management philosophy geared at continuous improvement of the quality of products and processes.

  2. In another venue, Donabedian elaborates on the quality of the interpersonal component of care to involve “excellent” communication, trust, and the treatment of the patient with “concern, empathy, honesty, tact, and sensitivity” [50].

  3. Having said that, “evidence-based” practice involves much more than empirical adequacy (see [73]). The common interchange between “evidence-based” and “empirically-tested” in many policy documents (see, e.g., [74]) is inappropriate and misleading.

References

  1. Shortell, Stephen M., Thomas G. Rundall, and John Hsu. 2007. Improving patient care by linking evidence-based medicine and evidence-based management. Journal of the American Medical Association 298(6): 673–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hope, Tony. 1996. Evidence-based patient choice. London: King’s Fund Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greenhalgh, Trisha. 2010. How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dickenson, Donna, and Paolo Vineis. 2002. Evidence-based medicine and quality of care. Health Care Analysis 10(3): 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers, Wendy. 2002. Is there a tension between doctors’ duty of care and evidence-based medicine? Health Care Analysis 10(3): 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loughlin, Michael. 1993. The illusion of quality. Health Care Analysis 1(1): 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sackett, David L., M.C. William, J.A. Rosenberg, R. Muir Gray, Brian Haynes, and W. Scott Richardson. 1996. Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal 312(7023): 71–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cartwright, Nancy. 2007. Are RCTs the gold standard? Biosocieties 2(2): 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Worrall, John. 2002. What evidence is evidence-based medicine? Philosophy of Science 69(3): S316–S330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jadad, Alejandro R., and Murray W. Enkin. 2007. Randomized controlled trials: Questions, answers, and musings, 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borgerson, Kirstin. 2009. Valuing evidence: Bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52(2): 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stegenga, Jacob. 2011. Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 429(4): 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grossman, Jason, and Fiona J. Mackenzie. 2005. Randomized controlled trials: Gold standard, or merely standard? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48(4): 516–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giacomini, Mita. 2009. Theory-based medicine and the role of evidence: Why the emperor needs new clothes, again. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52(2): 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Angell, Marcia. 2004. The truth about the drug companies: How they deceive us and what to do about it. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bodenheimer, Thomas. 2000. Uneasy alliance: Clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. New England Journal of Medicine 342(20): 1539–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lexchin, Joel, Lisa A. Bero, Benjamin Djulbegovic, and Otavio Clark. 2003. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome quality: Systematic review. British Medical Journal 326: 1167–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Psaty, Bruce M., Noel S. Weiss, and Curt D. Furberg. 2006. Recent trials in hypertension: Compelling science or commercial speech? Journal of the American Medical Association 295(14): 1704–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Loewy, Erich E. 2007. Ethics and evidence-based medicine: Is there a conflict? Medscape General Medicine 9(3): 30.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Henry, Stephen G. 2006. Recognizing tacit knowledge in medical epistemology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27(3): 187–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dawson, Neal V., and Hal R. Arkes. 1987. Systematic errors in medical decision making: Judgment limitations. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2(3): 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oxman, Andrew D., and Gordon H. Guyatt. 1993. The science of reviewing research. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 703: 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MacCoun, Robert J. 1998. Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Annual Review of Psychology 49: 259–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sackett, David L. 1989. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 95(2 suppl.): 2S–4S.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Upshur, Ross. 2005. Looking for rules in a world of exceptions: Reflections on evidence-based practice. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48(4): 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldenberg, Maya J. 2009. Iconoclast or creed? Objectivism and pragmatism in evidence-based medicine’s hierarchy of evidence. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52(2): 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ashcroft, Richard, Tony Hope, and Michael Parker. 2001. Ethical issues and evidence-based patient choice. In Evidence-based patient choice: Inevitable or impossible? ed. Adrian Edwards and Glynn Elwyn, 53–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bluhm, Robyn. 2010. Evidence-based medicine and patient autonomy. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2(2): 134–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Molewijk, A.C., A.M. Stiggelbout, W. Otten, H.M. Dupuis, and J. Kievit. 2003. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: A plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Analysis 11: 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Curtis, Keith. 1993. Total quality and management philosophies. In The textbook of total quality in healthcare, ed. A.F. Al-Assaf and June A. Schmele, 191–205. Del Ray, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weis, Curtis J., and Luis A.N. Ameral. 2010. Moving the science of quality improvement in critical medicine forward. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 182: 1461–1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Scales, Damon C., Katie Dainty, Brigette Hales, et al. 2011. A multifaceted intervention for quality improvement in a network of intensive care units: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 305(4): 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Berwick, Donald M. 2008. The science of improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association 299(10): 1182–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Al-Assaf, A.F., and June A. Schmele, eds. 1993. The textbook of total quality in healthcare. Delray Beach, FL: St Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Joss, Richard, and Maurice Kogan. 1995. Advancing quality: Total quality management in the National Health Service. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bodenheimer, Thomas. 1999. The movement for improved quality in health care. New England Journal of Medicine 340(6): 488–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Steffen, Grant E. 1988. Quality medical care: A definition. Journal of the American Medical Association 260(1): 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Reerink, Evert. 1990. Defining quality of care: Mission impossible? International Journal of Quality Health Care 2(3–4): 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Blumenthal, David. 1996. Quality of care: What is it? New England Journal of Medicine 335(12): 891–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Campbell, Stephen, Martin O. Roland, and Stephen A. Buetow. 2000. Defining quality of care. Social Science and Medicine 51(11): 1611–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Donabedian, Avedis. 1966/2005. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Quarterly 83(4): 691–729.

  42. American Medical Association, Council of Medical Service. 1986. Quality of care. Journal of the American Medical Association 256(8): 1032–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Institute of Medicine. 1990. Medicare: A strategy for quality assurance, vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Donabedian, Avedis. 1979. The quality of medical care: A concept in search of a definition. Journal of Family Practice 9(2): 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2005. Guide to healthcare quality: How to know it when you see it. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wexler, Barbara. 2002. Health care, Quality of. In Encyclopedia of Nursing & Allied Health, vol. 2, ed. Kristine Krapp. Gale Cengage. http://www.enotes.com/health-care-quality-reference. Accessed Mar 18, 2012.

  47. Mawani, Amin. 2011. Can we get better for less: Value for money in Canadian health care. Burnaby, BC: Certified General Accountants of Canada. www.cga-canada.org/en-ca/ResearchReports/ca_rep_2011-04_healthcare.pdf. Accessed Mar 14, 2012.

  48. Daum, Wayne J., Mark R. Brinker, and David B. Nash. 2000. Quality and outcome determination in health care and orthopaedics: Evolution and current structure. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery 8: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Institute of Medicine. 1999. Measuring the quality of health care: A statement by the National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Donabedian, Avedis. 1988. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association 260(12): 1743–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Merriam-Webster. 2012. “Quality.” Merriam-Webster Online. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quality. Accessed Feb 11, 2012.

  52. Blumenthal, David. 1996. The origins of the quality-of-care debate. New England Journal of Medicine 335(15): 1146–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Health Services Research Group. 1992. Quality of care: 1. What is quality and how can it be measured? Canadian Medical Association Journal 146(12): 2153–2158.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Caper, Philip. 1988. Defining quality in medical care. Health Affairs 7(1): 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chassin, Mark R. 1998. Is healthcare ready for six-sigma quality? Milbank Quarterly 76(4): 565–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kols, Adrienne J., and Jill E. Sherman. 1998. Family planning programs: Improving quality. Population Reports, Series J, No. 47. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Population Information Program. http://www.k4health.org/pr/j47/j47chap2.shtml#2.2. Accessed March 30, 2012.

  57. Berwick, Donald M. 1989. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. New England Journal of Medicine 320(1): 53–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Brook, Robert H. 2010. The end of the quality improvement movement: Long live improving value. Journal of the American Medical Association 304(16): 1831–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mehlman, Maxwell J. 1986. Health care cost containment and medical technology: A critique of waste theory. Case Western Reserve Law Review 778: 784–794.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bucher, Rue. 1962. Pathology: A study of social movements within a profession. Social Problems 10(1): 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bucher, Rue, and Joan G. Stelling. 1969. Characteristics of professional organizations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 10(1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Pope, Catherine. 2003. Resisting evidence: The study of evidence-based medicine as a contemporary social movement. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 7(3): 267–282.

  63. Blumer, Herbert. 1995 [1955]. Social movements. In Social movements: critiques, concepts and case studies, ed. Stanford M. Lyman, 60–83. London: Macmillan.

  64. Wachter, Robert M. 2006. Expected and unanticipated consequences of the quality and information technology revolutions. Journal of the American Medical Association 295(23): 2780–2783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chassin, Mark R. 1991. Quality of care—time to act. Journal of the American Medical Association 266: 3472–3473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. National Council on Quality Assurance. 2008. Health plan report card. http://reportcard.ncqa.org/plan/external/Resources.aspx?Header=yes&Tab=WhyQualityMatters. Accessed March 14, 2012.

  67. Loughlin, Michael. 1996. The language of quality. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2(2): 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Stevenson, Charles L. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Stevenson, Charles L. 1963 [1938]. Persuasive definitions. In Facts and values: Studies in ethical analysis, ed. Charles L. Stevenson, 32–54. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  70. Bunnin, Nicholas, and Jiyuan Yu. 2004. Persuasive definition. The Blackwell dictionary of western philosophy, 504. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  71. Glasziou, Paul. 2006. Why is evidence-based medicine important? Evidence Based Medicine 11: 133–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Benitez-Bribiesca, Luis. 1999. Evidence-based medicine: A new paradigm? Archives of Medical Research 30(2): 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Goldenberg, Maya J. 2012. Innovating medical knowledge: Understanding evidence-based medicine as a socio-medical phenomenon. In Evidence-based medicine. ed. Nikolaos Sitara, 11–28. Rijeka: InTech Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  74. American Psychological Association Presidential Taskforce on Evidence-Based Practice. 2006. Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist (May–June): 271–284.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maya J. Goldenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldenberg, M.J. Defining “quality of care” persuasively. Theor Med Bioeth 33, 243–261 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9230-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9230-4

Keywords

Navigation