Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:51:15.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Of children and social robots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2023

Elizabeth J. Goldman Open the ORCID record for Elizabeth J. Goldman [Opens in a new window] ,
Anna-Elisabeth Baumann Open the ORCID record for Anna-Elisabeth Baumann [Opens in a new window]  and
Diane Poulin-Dubois Open the ORCID record for Diane Poulin-Dubois [Opens in a new window]
Elizabeth J. Goldman
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Human Development, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada elizabeth.godman@concorida.ca; anna-elisabeth.baumann@mail.concordia.ca; Diane.PoulinDubois@concordia.ca https://www.concordia.ca/artsci/psychology/research/cognitive-language-development-lab.html
Anna-Elisabeth Baumann
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Human Development, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada elizabeth.godman@concorida.ca; anna-elisabeth.baumann@mail.concordia.ca; Diane.PoulinDubois@concordia.ca https://www.concordia.ca/artsci/psychology/research/cognitive-language-development-lab.html
Diane Poulin-Dubois
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Human Development, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada elizabeth.godman@concorida.ca; anna-elisabeth.baumann@mail.concordia.ca; Diane.PoulinDubois@concordia.ca https://www.concordia.ca/artsci/psychology/research/cognitive-language-development-lab.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the target article, Clark and Fischer argue that little is known about children's perceptions of social robots. By reviewing the existing literature we demonstrate that infants and young children interact with robots in the same ways they do with other social agents. Importantly, we conclude children's understanding that robots are artifacts (e.g., not alive) develops gradually during the preschool years.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e35
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumann, A., Goldman, E. J., Meltzer, A., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2022). People do not always know best: Preschoolers’ trust in social robots. SocArXiv [under revision]. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/g37cqGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beran, T. N., Ramirez-Serrano, A., Kuzyk, R., Fior, M., & Nugent, S. (2011). Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child–robot interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 69(7–8), 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breazeal, C., Harris, P. L., DeSteno, D., Kory Westlund, J. M., Dickens, L., & Jeong, S. (2016). Young children treat robots as informants. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brink, K. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2020). Robot teachers for children? Young children trust robots depending on their perceived accuracy and agency. Developmental Psychology, 56(7), 1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernyak, N., & Gary, H. E. (2016). Children's cognitive and behavioral reactions to an autonomous versus controlled social robot dog. Early Education and Development, 27(8), 1175–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, E. J. (2021). Preschool-age children's understanding about a novel robotic toy: Exploring the role of parent–child conversation [Doctoral dissertation]. UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Goldman, E. J., Baumann, A, & Poulin-Dubois, D. (in press). Preschoolers anthropomorphizing of robots: Do human-like properties matter? Frontiers in Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1102370Google Scholar
Gottfried, G. M., & Gelman, S. A. (2005). Developing domain-specific causal-explanatory frameworks: The role of insides and immanence. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itakura, S., Okanda, M., & Moriguchi, Y. (2008). Discovering mind: Development of mentalizing in human children. In Itakura, S. & Fujita, K. (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary and developmental views (pp. 179–198). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-75179-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jipson, J. L., & Gelman, S. A. (2007). Robots and rodents: Children's inferences about living and nonliving kinds. Child Development, 78(6), 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, M., Yi, S., & Lee, D. (2019). Between living and nonliving: Young children's animacy judgments and reasoning about humanoid robots. PLoS ONE, 14(6), e0216869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216869CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manzi, F., Peretti, G., Di Dio, C., Cangelosi, A., Itakura, S., Kanda, T., … Marchetti, A. (2020). A robot is not worth another: Exploring children's mental state attribution to different humanoid robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., Brooks, R., Shon, A. P., & Rao, R. P. N. (2010). “Social” robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 966–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.09.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moriguchi, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Shimada, Y., & Itakura, S. (2011). Can young children learn words from a robot? Interaction Studies, 12, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwangi, E., Barakova, E. I., Diaz, M., Mallofre, A. C., & Rauterberg, M. (2018). Dyadic Gaze Patterns during Child–Robot Collaborative Gameplay in a Tutoring Interaction. 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Nanjing and Tai'an, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/roman.2018.8525799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, L., Poulin-Dubois, D., Demke, T., & Guay, A. (2009). Can infants use a nonhuman agent's gaze direction to establish word–object relations? Infancy, 14(4), 414–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000902994073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okumura, Y., Kanakogi, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Itakura, S. (2013). Can infants use robot gaze for object learning? Interaction Studies, 14(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.14.3.03okuCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peca, A., Simut, R., Cao, H.-L., & Vanderborght, B. (2016). Do infants perceive the social robot Keepon as a communicative partner? Infant Behavior and Development, 42, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.10.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleihauf, H., Hoehl, S., Tsvetkova, N., König, A., Mombaur, K., & Pauen, S. (2021). Preschoolers’ motivation to over-imitate humans and robots. Child Development, 92(1), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Setoh, P., Wu, D., Baillargeon, R., & Gelman, R. (2013). Young infants have biological expectations about animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(40), 15937–15942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314075110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommer, K., Davidson, R., Armitage, K. L., Slaughter, V., Wiles, J., & Nielsen, M. (2020). Preschool children overimitate robots, but do so less than they overimitate humans. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191, 104702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104702CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommer, K., Slaughter, V., Wiles, J., Owen, K., Chiba, A. A., Forster, D., … Nielsen, M. (2021). Can a robot teach me that? Children's ability to imitate robots. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, 105040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stower, R., Calvo-Barajas, N., Castellano, G., & Kappas, A. (2021). A meta-analysis on children's trust in social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(8), 1979–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00736-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thellman, S., de Graaf, M., & Ziemke, T. (2022). Mental state attribution to robots: A systematic review of conceptions, methods, and findings. ACM Transactions on Human–Robot Interaction (THRI), 11(4), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526112CrossRefGoogle Scholar