Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T01:21:34.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Persistence of Physician–Parent Conflicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2010

Extract

In 1985, after a long university career teaching philosophy and humanities, in which my only serious worries over the years were centered on such things as getting promoted, course preparations, and faculty affairs, I found myself confronted, as a medical ethics committee member, with a life and death issue. It concerned the care of an infant suffering from posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus, for which there appeared to be no permanently effective treatment. The parents refused to consider the discontinuing of aggressive care even though this prolonged the suffering of their child. This standoff continued for 5 months, until the parents decided that it was God’s wish that aggressive treatment cease.

Type
Perspectives
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kolata, G. Battle over a baby’s future raises hard ethical questions. The New York Times 1994 Dec 7Google Scholar.

2. See note 1, Kolata 1994.

3. Schneiderman, LJ, Jecker, NS, Jonsen, AR. Medical futility: Its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 1990;112:949–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4. Bernat, JL. Medical futility: Definition, determination and disputes in critical care. Neurocritical Care 2005;2:198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

5. Texas Health and Safety Code, section 166.046, Vernon Suppl. 2006.

6. Moseley, KL, Silveira, MJ, Goold, SD. Futility in evolution. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 2005;21:213Google Scholar.

7. Witt, H. Right to life vs. futile care law. Chicago Tribune 2006 Sep 26Google Scholar.