Abstract
Do computers have beliefs? I argue that anyone who answers in the affirmative holds a view that is incompatible with what I shall call the commonsense approach to the propositional attitudes. My claims shall be two. First,the commonsense view places important constraints on what can be acknowledged as a case of having a belief. Second, computers – at least those for which having a belief would be conceived as having a sentence in a belief box – fail to satisfy some of these constraints. This second claim can best be brought out in the context of an examination of the idea of computer self-knowledge and self-deception, but the conclusion is perfectly general: the idea that computers are believers, like the idea that computers could have self-knowledge or be self-deceived, is incompatible with the commonsense view. The significance of the argument lies in the choice it forces on us: whether to revise our notion of belief so as to accommodate the claim that computers are believers, or to give up on that claim so as to preserve our pretheoretic notion of the attitudes. We cannot have it both ways.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bilgrami (1990), ‘Dummett, Realism, and Other Minds’, unpublished manuscript.
Bringsjord (1992), What Robots Can and Can't Be, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Davidson (1970), ‘Mental Events’, in Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Davidson (1974), ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, in Essays on Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: OUP, 1990.
Davidson (1984), ‘First Person Authority’, Dialectica, 38.
Davidson (1987), ‘Knowing One's Own Mind’, Presidential Address to the American Philosophical Association, 60.
Dennett (1978), Brainstorms, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dennett (1987), The Intentional Stance, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dennett (1990) ‘Brain Writing and Mind Reading’, in Rosenthal ed., The Nature of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grandy (1973), ‘Reference, Meaning, and Belief’, Journal of Philosophy, 70.
Putnam (1960), ‘Minds and Machines’, in Mind Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume II, Cambridge: CUP, 1975.
Putnam (1967), ‘The Nature of Mental States’, in Mind Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume II, Cambridge: CUP, 1975.
Putnam (1967b), ‘The Mental Life of Some Machines’, in Mind Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume II, Cambridge: CUP, 1975.
Pylyshyn (1984), Computation and Cognition, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldberg, S.C. The Very Idea of Computer Self-Knowledge and Self-Deception. Minds and Machines 7, 515–529 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008210414600
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008210414600