Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Moving beyond dichotomies: Liao, S. Matthew (ed.), Moral Brains: The Neuroscience of Morality, Oxford University Press, 2016

  • Review Essay
  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Matthew Liao’s edited collection Moral Brains: The Neuroscience of Morality covers a wide range of issues in moral psychology. The collection should be of interest to philosophers, psychologist, and neuroscientists alike, particularly those interested in the relation between these disciplines. I give an overview of the content and major themes of the volume and draw some important lessons about the connection between moral neuroscience and normative ethics. In particular, I argue that moving beyond some of the dichotomies implicit in some of the debates advanced in the book makes the neuroscience of moral judgment much more useful in advancing normative ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blair RJR (2007) The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends Cogn Sci 11:387–392. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockett MJ (2013) Models of morality. Trends Cogn Sci 17:363–366. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daw ND, Gershman SJ, Seymour B, Dayan P, Dolan RJ (2011) Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors. Neuron 69:1204–1215. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G (2008) Moral intuition = fast and frugal heuristics? In: Sinnott-Armstrong W (ed) Moral psychology: the cognitive science of morality: intuition and diversity, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene JD (2014) Beyond point-and-shoot morality: why cognitive (neuro)science matters for ethics. Ethics 124:695–726. doi:10.1086/675875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene JD, Nystrom LE, Engell AD, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2004) The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44:389–400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J (2012) The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J, Bjorklund F (2008) Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W (ed) Moral psychology: the cognitive science of morality: intuition and diversity, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 181–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji DY, Wilson MA (2007) Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nat Neurosci 10:100–107. doi:10.1038/Nn1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Frederick S (2005) A model of heuristic judgments. In: Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG (eds) The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge Universty Press, Cambridge, pp 267–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson C, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Koralus PE, Mendelovici A, McGeer V, Wheatley T (2011) Is morality unified? Evidence that distinct neural systems underlie moral judgments of harm, dishonesty, and disgust. J Cogn Neurosci 23:3162–3180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigden CR (2010) Hume on is and ought. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET (2005) Emotion explained. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhav A, Greene JD (2010) Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude. Neuron 67:667–677. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong W (2008) Is moral phenomenology unified? Phenomenol Cogn Sci 7:85–97. doi:10.1007/s11097-007-9065-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong W, Wheatley T (2012) The disunity of morality and why it matters to philosophy. Monist 95:355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong W, Wheatley T (2013) Are moral judgments unified? Philos Psychol 27:451–474. doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.736075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong W, Young L, Cushman F (2010) Moral intuitions. In: Doris J (ed) The moral psychology handbook. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 246–272

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson VA (2009) Dual-process theories: a metacognitive perspective. In: Evans JSBT, Frankish K (eds) In two minds: dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 171–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson VA, Prowse Turner JA, Pennycook G (2011) Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cogn Psychol 63:107–140. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (1995) The point of view of the universe: Sidgwick and the ambitions of ethics. In: Altham JEJ, Harrison R (eds) Making sense of humanity and other philosophical papers, 1982–1993. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 153–171

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For helpful comments and suggestions, I would like to thank Claudia Passos-Ferreira and Zoe Drayson.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Gonzalez-Cabrera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonzalez-Cabrera, I. Moving beyond dichotomies: Liao, S. Matthew (ed.), Moral Brains: The Neuroscience of Morality, Oxford University Press, 2016. Biol Philos 32, 1035–1046 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9590-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9590-2

Keywords

Navigation