Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic Maneuvering in Direct to Consumer Drug Advertising: A Study in Argumentation Theory and New Institutional Theory

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New Institutional Theory is used to explain the context for argumentation in modern practice. The illustration of Direct to Consumer Drug advertising is deployed to show how communicative argument between a doctor and patient is influenced by force exogenous to the practice of medicine. The essay shows how strategic maneuvering shifts the burden of proof within institutional relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikin, K.J., J.L. Swasy, and A. Braman. 2004. Patient and physician attitudes and behaviors associated with DTC promotion of prescription drugs: Summary of FDA survey research results. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved January 29, 2008, from http://www.fda.gov/cder/ddmac/Final%20Report/FRFinalExSu1119042.pdf.

  • Berndt, E.R. 2005. To inform or persuade? Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. The New England Journal of Medicine 352: 325–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, J.E. 2002. Public policy issues in direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Journal of Policy & Marketing 21: 174–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Medical Consumers. 2007. Rein in those deceptive drug ads. Retrieved January 29, 2008 from http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/CMCTOFDAREININTHOSEDECEPTIVEDRUGADS.html.

  • Cohen, E.P. 1990. Are pharmaceutical ads good medicine? Business and Society Review 2: 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S.N. 1968. Social institutions: The concept. In International encyclopedia of the social sciences, ed. D. Sills, Vol. 14, 401–420. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. 1991. The structural transformation of American industry. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. W.W. Powell and P.T. DiMaggio, 311–336. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., and R.R. Alford. 1991. Bringing society back in symbols, practices, institutional contradictions. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, 232–265. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1983. The theory of communicative action: System and lifeworld (trans: McCarthy, Thomas). Cambridge: MIT University Press.

  • Harker, M., and D. Harker. 2007. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicines: A systematic review of the evidence from the perspective of the consumer. Journal of Medical Marketing 7: 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harremoes, P., D. Gee, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, B. Wynne, and V.S. Guedes (Eds.). 2002. The precautionary principle in the twentieth century: Late lessons from early warnings. London: Earthscan.

  • Haveman, H.A. 2000. The future of organizational sociology: Forging ties among paradigms. Contemporary Sociology 29: 476–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1991. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, 41–62. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes, B. et al. 2002. Influence to direct to consumer pharmaceutical advertising and patients’ requests on prescribing decisions: Two site cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal 324: 278–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. 1960. Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. (J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perri, M., and W.M. Dickson. 1987. Direct to consumer prescription drug advertising: Consumer attitudes and physician reaction. Journal of Pharmaceutical Marketing & Management 2(1): 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W., and P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.). 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Roth, M.S. 1996. Patterns in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print advertising and their public policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 15: 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, M.C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20: 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1986. Rationality in psychology and economics. The Journal of Business 59: S209–S224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., and T. Greenwood. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly 50: 35–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P.H., and W. Ocasio. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. The American Journal of Sociology 105: 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H. (Ed.). 2002. Advances in pragma-dialectics. New Port News, VA: Vale Press.

  • van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: University Press.

  • van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 2002. Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In Advances in pragma-dialectics, ed. F. H. van Eemeren, 13–28. New Port News, VA: Vale Press.

  • Villanueva, P., and J. Librero. 2003. Accuracy of pharmaceutical advertising in medical journals. The Lancet 361: 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.R., and P.J. Hensel. 1995. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Journal of Health Care Marketing. 15: 14–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woloshin, S., L. Schwart, J. Tremmel, and H. Welch. 2001. Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs: What are Americans being sold?. The Lancet 358: 1141–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyke, A. 2004. Market analysis: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing patient views: DTC advertising. International Journal of Medical Marketing 4: 310–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Thomas Goodnight.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodnight, G.T. Strategic Maneuvering in Direct to Consumer Drug Advertising: A Study in Argumentation Theory and New Institutional Theory. Argumentation 22, 359–371 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9093-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9093-z

Keywords

Navigation