Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recognizing and Justifying Private Corruption

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While public (or government) corruption has attracted a lot of attention, private (or business) corruption has been relatively under-addressed. A specific form of corruption, namely, paying a bribe to a public official, is easily identifiable as unethical and possibly illegal, but this is not clear in a private business context. Yet private bribery also has serious organizational consequences. This exploratory study suggests that individuals have difficulty in recognizing the ethical connotations of potential bribery, and draws attention to the need to build skills in this regard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AACSB International.: 2004, Ethics Education in Business Schools: Report of the Ethics Education Task Force to AACSB International’s Board of Directors. AACSB, St Louis, Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  • Andelman D. A.: 1998, Bribery: The new Global Outlaw. Management Review 87(4), 49–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed M. M., K. Y. Chung, J. W. Eichenseher: 2003, Business Students’ Perception of Ethics And Moral Judgment: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandona A.: 2003, Private-to-Private Corruption. Journal of Business Ethics 47, 253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arruda M. C.: 1997, Business Ethics in Latin America. Journal of Business Ethics 16(14), 1597–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg N., D. Holtbrugge: 2001. Public Affairs Management Activities of German Multinational Corporations in India. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boathright J.: 2000, Ethics and the Conduct of Business. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand V., A. Slater: 2003, Using a Qualitative Approach to Gain Insights into the Business Ethics Experiences of Australian Managers in China. Journal of Business Ethics 45, 167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Line: 2004, ‹Corruption Costs $ 1 Trillion’, 2 August, p. 14

  • Callahan D.: 1980, ‹Goals in the Teaching of Ethics. In D. Callahan, S. Bok (eds.), Ethics Teaching in Higher Education. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 61–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry J., M. Lee, C. S. Chien: 2003, A Cross-Cultural Application of a Theoretical Model of Business Ethics: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Data. Journal of Business Ethics 44, 359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie P. M. J., I-W. G. Kwon, P. A. Stoeberl, R. Baumhart: 2003, A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Attitudes of Business Managers: India, Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 263–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esterl, M. and D. Crawford: 2007, ‹In Bribe Probe, Siemens Ex-Staffer Cites Payment’, Wall Street Journal p. A11

  • Fadiman, J. A.: 1986, ‹A Traveler’s Guide to Gifts and Bribes’, Harvard Business Review 64 (4), 122–136

  • Hamara W.: 2000, Bribery in International Business Transactions and the OECD Convention: Benefits and Limitations. Business Economics 35(4), 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Khera I.: 2001, Business Ethics East vs. West: Myths and Realities. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Jr. N.: 2004, ‹Halliburton Tells the Pentagon Workers Took Iraq-Deal Kickbacks’, Wall Street Journal 23 January, p. A1

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y.: 2002, Corruption and Organization in Asian Management Systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19, 405–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMorris, F. A.: 1999, ‹Bid-Rigging, Kickbacks Inflated Costs for Many Companies, Prosecutors Find’, Wall Street Journal, 1 February, p. 1

  • Powpaka S.: 2002, Factors Affecting Managers’ Decision to Bribe: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 40, 227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punnett B. J.: 1994, Experiencing International Business Management. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman S.: 1999, Corruption and Government Causes, Consequences and Reform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeltzer L. R., M. M. Jennings: 1998, Why an International Code of Business Ethics Would Be Good For Business. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens B.: 2001, Hospitality Ethics: Responses from Human Resource Directors and Students to Seven Ethical Scenarios. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald R.: 1990, Corruption, Development and Underdevelopment. Duke University Press, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wated G., J. I. Sanchez: 2005, The Effects of Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Attributions, and Individualism—Collectivism on Managers’ Responses to Bribery in Organizations: Evidence from a Developing Nation. Journal of Business Ethics 61, 111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Gopinath.

Additional information

C. Gopinath is a professor in the Management Department, Sawyer Business School, Suffolk University and is a visiting professor at the Institut D’Administration des Entreprises, Aix en Provence. His research, teaching and consulting interests span strategic management and international business. His current work is titled ‹Globalization: A multidisciplinary system’ (Sage, forthcoming).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gopinath, C. Recognizing and Justifying Private Corruption. J Bus Ethics 82, 747–754 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9589-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9589-8

Keywords

Navigation