“Clinician Knows Best”? Injustices in the Medicalization of Mental Illness

Authors

  • Abigail Gosselin Regis University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7285

Keywords:

medicalization, mental illness, stereotypes, epistemic injustice, marginalization

Abstract

This paper uses a non-ideal theory approach advocated for by Alison Jaggar to show that practices involved with the medicalization of serious mental disorders can subject people who have these disorders to a cycle of vulnerability that keeps them trapped within systems of injustice. When medicalization locates mental disorders solely as problems of individual biology, without regard to social factors, and when it treats mental disorders as personal defects, it perpetuates injustice in several ways: by enabling biased diagnoses through stereotyping, by exploiting and coercing people who are seen as insufficiently competent, and by perpetuating idealized conceptions of choice and control that do not take into account people’s real limitations and the social context of health. Through practices of diagnosis, treatment, and recovery, medicalization can perpetuate injustices toward people who have serious mental disorders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Abigail Gosselin, Regis University

ABIGAIL GOSSELIN is a professor of philosophy at Regis University in Denver. She is the author of Global Poverty and Individual Responsibility (Lexington 2009) and numerous papers in social philosophy. Her current work examines stigma and agency in mental illness.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-25

How to Cite

Gosselin, Abigail. 2019. “‘Clinician Knows Best’? Injustices in the Medicalization of Mental Illness”. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7285.

Issue

Section

Special Issue: In the Unjust Meantime

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.