Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:06:19.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Πωρισ, Λυπιοσ Φργιοσ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

A. S. F. Gow
A. S. F. Gow
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , May 1945 , pp. 5 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 5 note 1 Beyond this epigram nothing is known of Hegemon. He is not mentioned by Meleager, but A.P. 7. 430–43 is thought to be a section of the Garland (Stadtmueller, Anth. Gr. 2. li; cf. RE vii. 2596). The phrase in Suidas is derived from Diog. L. 4. 19 or from a common source, but in Diogenes the words are .

page 5 note 2 If Pratinas really wrote as the MSS. of Athen. 14. 617 F assert (Bergk records δρον and δώρειον as variants: Kaibel notes none), it is no proof of such a distinction in the fifth century, as the following passages show: Pind. N. 4. 45 8. 15 , fr. 191 , Aesch. fr. 59 βασσάρας, λνδίας Pherecr. fr. 181..

page 5 note 3 Wirth, M., who devoted pp. 1–56 of LeipzGoogle Scholar. Stud., vol. iii to the declension of adjectives in ιος,ειος, and -ιμος, mentions none of these three, and I have consulted with no more advantage Kühner Blass, i. 535 ff., Meisterhans, , Gr. Alt. Inschr.3146Google Scholar, Lobeck, Phryn., p. 105, and on Soph. Aj. 224, Ztschrup. f. öst. Gymn. xxvii. 801, Ztschr. f. Gymnasiahv. xvi Jahresb. 198, xx Jakresb. 31.

page 6 note 1 I cannot accept Edmonds's rendering ‘The speech is the Dorian, and the theme is the inventor of comedy’. The point is that the Dorian dialect is used because the subject also is Dorian.