Abstract
This paper investigates the possibilities and problems of benchmarking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). After a methodological analysis of the advantages and problems of benchmarking, we develop a benchmark method that includes economic, social and environmental aspects as well as national and international aspects of CSR. The overall benchmark is based on a weighted average of these aspects. The weights are based on the opinions of companies and NGO's. Using different methods of weighting, we find that the outcome of the benchmark is rather robust for a sample of more than 50 large Dutch companies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, E.: 1993, Value in Ethics and Economics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge/London).
Chryssides, G. and J. H. Kaler: 1993, An Introduction to Business Ethics (Chapman & Hall, London).
Erp, H. van: 2000, Moraal geluk en verantwoordelijkheid (Van Gorcum, Assen).
Eijffinger, S. C. W. and P. M. Geraats: 2002, ‘How Transparent are Central Banks?’, CEPR Discussion Paper, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Graafland, J. J.: 2002, ‘Modelling the Trade off between Profits and Principles’, De Economist 150, 129–154.
Graafland, J. J., B. W. van de Ven and N. Stoffele: 2002, ‘Wat betekent maatschappelijk ondernemen concreet?’, University of Tilburg, www.uvt.nl/wijsbegeerte/ cmo
Graafland, J. J., B. W. van de Ven and N. Stoffele: 2003a, ‘Strategies and instruments for organising CSR by small and large business in the Netherlands’, Journal of Business Ethics 47, 45–60.
Graafland, J. J., S. C. W. Eijffinger, N. C. G. M. Stoffele, H. Smid and A. M. Coldeweijer: 2003b, Corporate social responsibility of Dutch companies: Benchmarking and Transparency, http://www.uvt.nl/faculteiten/ fww/cmo.
Graves, S. B., S. A. Waddock and J. Kelly: 2002, ‘100 Best Corporate Citizens’, Business Ethics 11(2), 8–13.
Hausman, D. M.: 1992, The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Hurka, T.: 1996, ‘Monism, Pluralism, and Rational Regret’, Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political and Legal Philosophy 106(3), 555–575.
Jeurissen, R. J. M. (ed.): 2000, Bedrijfsethiek: een goed zaak (Van Gorcum, Assen).
Jonker, J. (ed.): 2000, AA 1000 standaard: richtlijn voor maatschappelijk verantwoord ondernemen (Van Gorcum, Assen).
Kleinfeld, A.: 2001, ‘Benchmarking the moral decisionmaking strength of European biotech companies: a European research project’, Business Ethics: A European Review 10, 122–139.
Krut, R. and K. Munis: 1998, ‘Sustainable Industrial Development: Benchmarking Environmental Policies and Reports’, Greener Management International 21, 88–98.
Laat, P. B. de: 2001, ‘Open source software: A new Mertonian ethos?’, in A. Vedder (ed.), Ethics and the Internet (Intersentia, Antwerpen-Groningen-Oxford), pp. 33–47.
MacLean, D.: 1994, ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis and Procedural Values’, Analyse & Kritik, 16(2), 166–180.
McIntosh, M., D. Leipziger, K. Jones and G. Coleman: 1998, Corporate Citizenship: Successful Strategies for Responsible Companies (Financial Times Pitman Publishing, London/San Francisco).
Peperstraten, F. van: 1999, Samenleving ter discussie (Coutinho, Bussum).
PriceWaterhouseCoopers: Ondernemingsanalyses: 2001, Trends in de chemie (Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie B. V., Dordrecht).
PriceWaterhouseCoopers: Ondernemingsanalyses: 2002a, Trends in de bouw (Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie B. V., Dordrecht).
PriceWaterhouseCoopers: Ondernemingsanalyses: 2002b, Trends in de retail (Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie B. V., Dordrecht).
PriceWaterhouseCoopers: Ondernemingsanalyses: 2002c, Trends bij banken (Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie B. V., Dordrecht).
Social Economic Council: 2001, Corporate social Responsibility: A Dutch Approach (Van Gorcum, Assen).
Velasquez, M. G.: 1998, Business ethics. Concepts and Cases, 4th Edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey).
Vlek, C. A. J., E. M. Steg, D. Feenstra, W. Gerbens-Leenis, S. Lindenberg, H. Moll, A. Schoot Uiterkamp, F. Sijtsma and A. Van Witteloostuijn: 2002, ‘Een praktisch model voor duurzaam bedrijfspresteren’, Economisch Statistische Berichten 87, 524–527.
Waddock, S. A. and S. B. Graves: 1997, ‘The corporate social performance-financial performance link’, Strategic Management Journal, 303–319.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graafland, J.J., Eijffinger, S. & SmidJohan, H. Benchmarking of Corporate Social Responsibility: Methodological Problems and Robustness. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 137–152 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039404.67854.e1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039404.67854.e1