Abstract
Gould's Structure ofEvolutionary Theory argues that Darwinism hasundergone significant revision. Although Gouldsucceeds in showing that hierarchicalapproaches have expanded Darwinism, hiscritique of adaptationism is less successful. Gould claims that the ubiquity of developmentalconstraints and spandrels has forced biologiststo soften their commitment to adaptationism. Iargue that Gould overstates his conclusion; hisprincipal claims are compatible with at leastsome versions of adaptationism. Despite thisweakness, Gould's discussion of adaptationism –particularly his discussions of the exaptivepool and cross-level spandrels – shouldprovoke new work in evolutionary theory and thephilosophy of biology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Godfrey Smith, P.: 2001, 'Three Kinds of Adaptationism', in S. Orzack and E. Sober (eds), Adaptationism and Optimality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 335–357.
Gould, S.J.: 1977, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gould, S.J.: 1989, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, Norton, New York.
Gould, S.J.: 1991, 'The Disparity of the Burgess Shale Arthropod Fauna and the Limits of Cladistic Analysis: Why We Must Strive to Quantify Morphospace', Paleobiology 17, 411–423.
Gould, S.J.: 1999, Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life, Ballantine, New York.
Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C.: 1979, 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme', Proc. R. Soc Lond. B 205, 581–598.
Grant, P.R.: 1986, Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Grantham, T.A.: 1995, 'Hierarchical Approaches to Macroevolution', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26, 301–321.
Grantham, T.A.: 2001, 'Hierarchies in Evolution', in D.E.G. Briggs and P. Crowther (eds), Palaeobiology II, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 190–194.
Grantham, T.A.: 2002, 'Species Selection', in M. Pagel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1086–1087.
Hull, D.L.: 1998, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lloyd, E.A. and Gould, S.J.: 1993, 'Species Selection on Variability', Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 90, 595–599.
Mayr, E.: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pigliucci, M. and Kaplan, J.: 2000, 'The Fall and Rise of Dr. Pangloss: Adaptationism and the Spandrels Paper 20 Years Later', Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 66–70.
Reeve, H.K. and Sherman, P.W.: 1993, 'Adaptation and the Goals of Evolutionary Research', Quarterly Review of Biology 68, 1–32.
Rose,M.R. and Lauder, G.V.: 1996, 'Post-Spandrel Adaptationism', in Rose and Lauder (eds), Adaptation, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 1–8.
Sober, E.: 1996, 'Six Sayings about Adaptationism', reprinted in D.L. Hull and M. Ruse (eds), The Philosophy of Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 72–86.
Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P.: 1999, Sex and Death, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Vrba, E.S. and Gould, S.J.: 1986, 'The Hierarchical Expansion of Sorting and Selection: Sorting and Selection Cannot be Equated', Paleobiology 12, 217–228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grantham, T.A. Constraints and Spandrels in Gould's Structure of Evolutionary Theory . Biology & Philosophy 19, 29–43 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIPH.0000013261.77799.94
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIPH.0000013261.77799.94