Skip to main content
Log in

Positionalist voting functions

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Positionalist voting functions are those social choice functions where the positions of the alternatives in the voter's preference orders crucially influence the social ordering of the alternatives. An important subclass consists of those voting functions where numbers are assigned to the alternatives in the preference orders and the social ordering is computed from these numbers. Such voting functions are called representable. Various well-known conditions for voting functions are introduced and it is investigated which representable voting functions satisfy these conditions. It is shown that no representable voting function satisfies the Condorcet criterion. This condition and Arrow's independence condition, which are typical non-positionalist conditions, are shown to be incompatible. The Borda function, which is a well-known positionalist voting function, is studied extensively, conditions uniquely characterizing it are given and some modifications of the function are investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, K. J., Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black, D., The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borda, Jean-Charles de, ‘Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin’, Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, 1781.

  4. Fishburn, P. C., ‘A Comparative Analysis of Group Decision Methods’, Behavioral Science 16 (1971) 538–544.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fishburn, P. C., The Theory of Social Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansson, B., ‘Group Preferences’, Econometrica 37 (1969) 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hansson, B., ‘The Independence Condition in the Theory of Social Choice’, Theory and Decision, pp. 25–49 this issue.

  8. Sen, A. K., Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

My thanks are due to professor Bengt Hansson for encouragement and several helpful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gärdenfors, P. Positionalist voting functions. Theor Decis 4, 1–24 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133396

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133396

Keywords

Navigation