Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T12:55:20.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Horace, Odes i. 28. 7–8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. Gwyn Griffiths
Affiliation:
University College, Swansea.
A. Y. Campbell
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I was there, of course, arguing against Mr. Griffiths's deduction that since it must here mean ‘died’ it was ‘inexact’; but what I wrote is obviously equally applicable as against this other view, which had occurred to me as one that nobody would ever maintain.

2 Rose's remissus appears to have been intended for an incidental improvement. That word is, of course, ruled out by the following admissus, with which it would make antithesis but not point.