Abstract
Indefinites face competition at two levels: Presupposition and content. The antipresupposition hypothesis predicts that they signal the opposite of familiarity, or uniqueness, namely, novelty, or non-uniqueness. At the level of descriptive content, they are pressured from two sides: definites expressing identity and another phrases expressing difference, and Gricean reasoning predicts that indefinites signal both difference and identity and are infelicitous when definites and another phrases are felicitous. However, occasionally a space opens between the and another, for a to fill. This is in part due to conditions handicapping the or another semantically, in part to another’s phonological handicap. The division of labor between determiners in the field of difference and sameness is thus the result of an intricate competition. We model this competition in a version of game-theoretic pragmatics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott B. (2004) Definiteness and indefiniteness. In: Horn L., Ward G. (eds) Handbook of pragmatics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 122–149
Amsili P., Beyssade C. et al (2010) Obligatory presupposition in discourse. In: Benz A. (ed) Constraints in discourse 2. Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp 105–124
Asher N. (1987) A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 125–197
Barwise J., Cooper R. (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219
Beck S. (2000) The semantics of different: Comparison operator and relational adjective. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 101–139
Benz A., van Rooij R. (2007) Optimal assertions and what they implicate. Topoi—an International Review of Philosophy 27: 63–78
Blutner R. (1998) Lexical pragmatics. Journal of Semantics 15: 115–162
Blutner R. (2007) Optimality theoretic pragmatics and the explicature/implicature distinction. In: Burton-Roberts N. (ed) Advances in pragmatics. Palgrave/MacMillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, pp 67–89
Brasoveanu, A. (2009). Sentence-internal different as quantifier-internal Anaphora. Ms., UC Santa Cruz.
de Jager, T., van Rooij, R. (2007). Explaining quantity implicatures. In: Proceedings of the eleventh conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge (TARK XI) (pp. 193–202). Bruxelles.
Dekker P. (2002) Meaning and use of indefinite expressions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11: 141–194
Dekker P. (2004) The pragmatic dimension of indefinites. Research on Language and Computation 2: 365–399
Farkas D. (2002) Varieties of indefinites. In: Jackson B. (ed) Proceedings of SALT 12. CLC Publications, Ithaca, New York, pp 59–83
Farkas D. (2006) The unmarked determiner. In: Vogeleer-Aloushkova S., Tasmowski-de Rijk L. (eds) Non-definites and plurality. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 81–106
Fodor J., Sag I. (1982) Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355–400
Geurts B., Nouwen R. (2007) At least et al.: The semantics of scalar modifiers. Language 83: 533–559
Hawkins J. (1991) On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)-grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27: 405–442
Heim I. (1982) The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Heim I. (1991) Artikel und definitheit. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 487–535
Heim, I. (to appear). Definiteness and indefiniteness. T.a. In: von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C., & Portner, P. (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Oxford
Jäger, G. (to appear). Game theory in semantics and pragmatics. T.a. In: von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C., & Portner, P. (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kamp H. (2001) Computation and justification of presuppositions: One aspect of the interpretation of multi-sentence discourse. In: Bras M., Vieu L. (eds) Semantics and pragmatics of discourse and dialogue: Experimenting with current theories. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 57–84
Krifka M. (2001) Non-novel indefinites in adverbial quantification. In: Condoravdi C., Renardel de Lavalette G. (eds) Logical perspectives on language and information. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 1–40
Magri G. (2009) A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures. National Language Semantics 17: 245–297
Percus O. (2006) Antipresuppositions. In: Ueyama A. (ed) Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora: Toward the establishment of generative grammar as an empirical science. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Fukuoka, pp 52–73
Roberts C. (2003) Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 287–350
Sæbø K. J. (2004) Conversational contrast and conventional parallel: Topic implicatures and additive presuppositions. Journal of Semantics 21: 199–217
Sauerland Uli (2008) Implicated presuppositions. In: Steube A. (ed) The discourse potential of underspecified structures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 581–600
Schlenker P. (2008) Be articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection. Theoretical Linguistics 34: 157–212
Schlenker, P. (2011). Maximize presupposition and gricean reasoning manuscript. New York University: Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS.
Singh R. (2011) Maximize presupposition! and local contexts. Natural Language Semantics 19: 149–168
Stalnaker R. (1998) On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7: 3–19
Stalnaker R. (2002) Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721
von Fintel K. (1999) NPI licensing, strawson entailment, and context dependency. Journal of Semantics 16: 97–148
von Fintel, K., & Heim, I. (2010). Intensional semantics. Lecturenotes (2010 Edition), MIT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grønn, A., Sæbø, K.J. A, The, Another: A Game of Same and Different. J of Log Lang and Inf 21, 75–95 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-011-9148-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-011-9148-7