Skip to main content
Log in

A, The, Another: A Game of Same and Different

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indefinites face competition at two levels: Presupposition and content. The antipresupposition hypothesis predicts that they signal the opposite of familiarity, or uniqueness, namely, novelty, or non-uniqueness. At the level of descriptive content, they are pressured from two sides: definites expressing identity and another phrases expressing difference, and Gricean reasoning predicts that indefinites signal both difference and identity and are infelicitous when definites and another phrases are felicitous. However, occasionally a space opens between the and another, for a to fill. This is in part due to conditions handicapping the or another semantically, in part to another’s phonological handicap. The division of labor between determiners in the field of difference and sameness is thus the result of an intricate competition. We model this competition in a version of game-theoretic pragmatics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott B. (2004) Definiteness and indefiniteness. In: Horn L., Ward G. (eds) Handbook of pragmatics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 122–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsili P., Beyssade C. et al (2010) Obligatory presupposition in discourse. In: Benz A. (ed) Constraints in discourse 2. Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp 105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher N. (1987) A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 125–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise J., Cooper R. (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck S. (2000) The semantics of different: Comparison operator and relational adjective. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 101–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz A., van Rooij R. (2007) Optimal assertions and what they implicate. Topoi—an International Review of Philosophy 27: 63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner R. (1998) Lexical pragmatics. Journal of Semantics 15: 115–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blutner R. (2007) Optimality theoretic pragmatics and the explicature/implicature distinction. In: Burton-Roberts N. (ed) Advances in pragmatics. Palgrave/MacMillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, pp 67–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasoveanu, A. (2009). Sentence-internal different as quantifier-internal Anaphora. Ms., UC Santa Cruz.

  • de Jager, T., van Rooij, R. (2007). Explaining quantity implicatures. In: Proceedings of the eleventh conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge (TARK XI) (pp. 193–202). Bruxelles.

  • Dekker P. (2002) Meaning and use of indefinite expressions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11: 141–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker P. (2004) The pragmatic dimension of indefinites. Research on Language and Computation 2: 365–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas D. (2002) Varieties of indefinites. In: Jackson B. (ed) Proceedings of SALT 12. CLC Publications, Ithaca, New York, pp 59–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas D. (2006) The unmarked determiner. In: Vogeleer-Aloushkova S., Tasmowski-de Rijk L. (eds) Non-definites and plurality. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J., Sag I. (1982) Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts B., Nouwen R. (2007) At least et al.: The semantics of scalar modifiers. Language 83: 533–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins J. (1991) On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)-grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27: 405–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (1982) The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (1991) Artikel und definitheit. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 487–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (to appear). Definiteness and indefiniteness. T.a. In: von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C., & Portner, P. (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, G. (to appear). Game theory in semantics and pragmatics. T.a. In: von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C., & Portner, P. (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Kamp H. (2001) Computation and justification of presuppositions: One aspect of the interpretation of multi-sentence discourse. In: Bras M., Vieu L. (eds) Semantics and pragmatics of discourse and dialogue: Experimenting with current theories. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 57–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka M. (2001) Non-novel indefinites in adverbial quantification. In: Condoravdi C., Renardel de Lavalette G. (eds) Logical perspectives on language and information. CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Magri G. (2009) A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures. National Language Semantics 17: 245–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percus O. (2006) Antipresuppositions. In: Ueyama A. (ed) Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora: Toward the establishment of generative grammar as an empirical science. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Fukuoka, pp 52–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts C. (2003) Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 287–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæbø K. J. (2004) Conversational contrast and conventional parallel: Topic implicatures and additive presuppositions. Journal of Semantics 21: 199–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland Uli (2008) Implicated presuppositions. In: Steube A. (ed) The discourse potential of underspecified structures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 581–600

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker P. (2008) Be articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection. Theoretical Linguistics 34: 157–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, P. (2011). Maximize presupposition and gricean reasoning manuscript. New York University: Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS.

  • Singh R. (2011) Maximize presupposition! and local contexts. Natural Language Semantics 19: 149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. (1998) On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7: 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. (2002) Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel K. (1999) NPI licensing, strawson entailment, and context dependency. Journal of Semantics 16: 97–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, K., & Heim, I. (2010). Intensional semantics. Lecturenotes (2010 Edition), MIT.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kjell Johan Sæbø.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grønn, A., Sæbø, K.J. A, The, Another: A Game of Same and Different. J of Log Lang and Inf 21, 75–95 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-011-9148-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-011-9148-7

Keywords

Navigation