Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:52:34.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Love and the Patriarch: Augustine and (Pregnant) Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Patricia L. Grosse
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theories concerning love in the West tend to be bound by the problematic constraints of patriarchal conceptions of what counts ontologically as “true” or “universal” love. It seems that feminist love studies must choose between shining light on these constraints or bursting through them. In this article I give a feminist analysis of Augustine of Hippo's theory of love through a philosophical, psychological, and theological reading of his complicated relationships with women. I argue that, given the “embodied” nature of his many loves throughout his life, there is room in Augustine's account of love for a gendered reading of love that is unconstrained by patriarchal notions concerning which gender is capable of which kind of love. Augustine's theory of love is one that is not coldly universal but bodied and personal; indeed, although it is founded inside patriarchal historical constructions, it is capable of bursting out of these constraints and suggesting an egalitarian, nongendered view of love.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 32 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Love Studies, Winter 2017 , Winter 2017 , pp. 119 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apuleius, Lucius. 1999. The golden ass. Trans. E. J. Kenney. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1996. Love and Saint Augustine. Ed. Scott, Joanna Vecchiarelli and Stark, Judith Chelius. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine. 1982. The literal meaning of Genesis, vol. II. Trans. John Hammond Taylor. New York: Newman Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1998. Confessions. Trans. Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Babcock, William S. 1993. Cupiditas and caritas: The early Augustine on love and human fulfillment. In Augustine today, ed. Neuhaus, Richard John. Encounter Series 16. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Bowery, Anne‐Marie. 2007. Monica: The feminine face of Christ. In Feminist interpretations of Augustine, ed. Stark, Judith Chelius. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Burrus, Virginia. 2004. The sex lives of saints: An erotics of ancient hagiography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrus, Virginia. 2011. Fleeing the uxorious kingdom: Augustine's queer theology of marriage. Journal of Early Christian Studies 19 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrus, Virginia, Jordan, Mark D., and MacKendrick, Karmen. 2010. Seducing Augustine: Bodies, desires, confessions. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Burrus, Virginia, and Keller, Catherine. 2007. Confessing Monica. In Feminist interpretations of Augustine, ed. Stark, Judith Chelius. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Conybeare, Catherine. 2006. The irrational Augustine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019926208x.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, John Kevin. 1982. In praise of Monica: A note on the Ostia experience of Confessions IX. Augustinian Studies 13: 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilkerson, Luke. 2013. How to fight porn addiction like St. Augustine. http://chastityproject.com/2013/04/how-to-fight-porn-addiction-like-saint-augustine/ (accessed January 11, 2015).Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 2002. The birth of pleasure. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, and Richards, David A. J. 2009. The deepening darkness: Patriarchy, resistance, and democracy's future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, David G. 2003. Augustine and the making of marriage in Roman North Africa. Journal of Early Christian Studies 11 (1): 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, George. 1997. Augustine revisited. First Things 72: 43–46.Google Scholar
Miles, Margaret R. 2006. Desire and delight: A new reading of Augustine's Confessions. Eugene, Ore.: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
Miles, Margaret R. 2007. Not nameless but unnamed: The woman torn from Augustine's side. In Feminist interpretations of Augustine, ed. Stark, Judith Chelius. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Plotinus. 1991. The Enneads. Trans. Stephen Mackenna and John M Dillon. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Power, Kim. 1995. Veiled desire: Augustine on women. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schlabach, Gerald. 1998. “Love is the hand of the soul”: The grammar of Continence in Augustine's doctrine of Christian love. Journal of Early Christian Studies 6 (1): 59–92.10.1353/earl.1998.0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanzer, Danuta. 2002. Avulsa a latere meo: Augustine's spare rib: Confessions 6.15.25. Journal of Roman Studies 92: 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar