Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that there are more kinds of relative clause constructions between the linguistic heaven and earth than are dreamed of in the classical lore, which distinguishes just restrictive relative clauses and appositives. We start with degree relatives. Degree, or amount, relatives show restrictions in the relativizers they allow, in the determiners that can combine with them, and in their stacking possibilities. To account for these facts, we propose an analysis with two central, and novel, features: First, we argue that the standard notion of degree (a number on a measuring scale) needs to be replaced by a notion of structured degree, which keeps track of the object measured. Second, we argue that at the CP-level of degree relatives an operation of (degree) maximalization takes place. We show that the observed facts concerning degree relatives follow from these assumptions. We then broaden the discussion to other relative clause constructions. We propose that the operation of maximalization takes place in relative clauses when the head noun is semantically interpreted CP-internally, while syntactically the CP is part of a DP that also contains CP-external material. Based on this, we argue that degree relatives form part of a linguistically coherent class of relative clause constructions -- we call them maximalizing relatives -- which all show restrictions similar to those observed for degree relatives, and which differ semantically (and often also syntactically) both from restrictive relative clauses and from appositives. We discuss free relatives, internally-headed relatives, and correlatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bartsch, Renate: 1973, 'The Semantics and Syntax of Number and Numbers', in J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 51-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basilico, David: 1996, 'Head Position and Internally-Headed Relatives', Language 72, 498-894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, Valentina: 1995, Consequences of Antisymmetry for the Syntax of Headed Relative Clauses, PhD. dissertation, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria: 1994, 'Cross-linguistic Semantics', Linguistics and Philosophy 17(1), 53-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John: 1991, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Nominals', in S. Moore and A. Wyner (eds.), Proceedings from SALT 1, Cornell University, Ithaca, pp. 1-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan and Jane Grimshaw: 1978, 'The Syntax of Free Relatives in English', Linguistic Inquiry 9(3), 331-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1977a, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published by Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1977b, 'Amount Relatives', Language 53, 520-542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1977, 'On Wh-movement', in P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon: 1994, 'Is There LF-movement?' Linguistic Inquiry 25(2), 239-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav: 1991a, Wh Dependencies in Hindi and the Theory of Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav: 1991b, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives', Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 9, 637-686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav: 1995, 'Quantification in Correlatives', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.) Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav: 1996, Locality in Wh Quantification, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: 1980, 'Pronouns', Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1982, 'Semantic Analysis of Wh-Complements', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 175-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groos, Anneke and Henk van Riemsdijk: 1981, 'Matching Effects in Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar' in A. Belletti, L. Brandi and L. Rizzi (eds), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosu, Alexander: 1989, 'Pied-Piping and the Matching Parameter', The Linguistic Review 6(1), 41-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosu, Alexander: 1994, Three Studies in Locality and Case, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grosu, Alexander: 1996, 'The Proper Analysis of “Missing-P” Free Relative Constructions; A Reply to Larson', Linguistic Inquiry 27(2), 257-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosu, Alexander and Fred Landman: 1996, 'Carlson's Last Puzzle: Will It Go the Way of Fermat's Last Theorem?' in Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference and the Workshop on Discourse, Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, pp. 129-142.

  • Harbert, Wayne: 1983, 'On the Nature of the Matching Parameter', The Linguistic Review 2(3), 237-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbert, Wayne: 1992, 'Gothic Relative Clauses and Syntactic Theory', in I. Rauch, G. Carr and R. Kyes (eds.), On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 109-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1987, 'Where Does the Definiteness Restriction Apply? Evidence from the Definiteness of Variables', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (in)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 21-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschbuhler, Paul and Maria Rivero: 1981, 'Catalan Restrictive Relatives: Core and Periphery', Language 57(3), 591-625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschbuhler, Paul and Maria Rivero: 1983, 'Remarks on Free Relatives and Matching Phenomena', Linguistic Inquiry 14(3), 505-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack: 1983, 'Negative Polarity and the Comparative', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 403-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1988, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Free Relatives in English,' paper presented at the LSA Winter Meeting, New Orleans.

  • Jacobson, Pauline: 1995, 'On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 451-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, Nirit: 1987, On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published by Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Lanman: 1994, 'Any', Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4), 352-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1994, The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred: 1997, 'Parallels between the Nominal Domain and the Verbal Domain: The Case of Definitness Effects', manuscript, Tel Aviv University.

  • Landman, Fred: to appear, 'Plurals and Maximalization', in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

  • Larson, Richard: 1987, '“Missing Prepositions” and the Analysis of English Free Relative Clauses', Linguistics Inquiry 18(2), 239-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretic Approach', in R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 303-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, James: 1994, 'Remarks on Adsentential, Adnominal and Extraposed Relative Clauses in Hindi', paper presented at SALA 14, Stanford University.

  • Milsark, Gary: 1974, Existential Sentences in English, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Partee, Barbara: 1973, 'Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar', Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 509-534. Reprinted in B. Partee (ed.), 1976, Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York, pp. 51-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1987, 'Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type Shifting Principles', in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh and M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, GRASS 8, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Susan: 1995, 'Adverbial Quantification over Events', Natural Language Semantics 3, 1-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, Hotze: 1995, Maximality in the Semantics of Wh Constructions, Ph.D. dissertation, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, Peter: 1985, 'Restrictive and Non-Restrictive Modification', Report #CSLI-85-28, Stanford University.

  • von Stechow, Arnim: 1984, 'Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison', Journal of Semantics 1, 1-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suñer, Marguerita: 1984, 'Free Relatives and the Matching Parameter', The Linguistic Review 3(4), 363-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Janis: 1987, 'An Indefiniteness Restriction for Relative Clauses in Lakhota', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 168-190.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grosu, A., Landman, F. Strange Relatives of the Third Kind. Natural Language Semantics 6, 125–170 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008268401837

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008268401837

Keywords

Navigation