Abstract
In this paper, we argue that there are more kinds of relative clause constructions between the linguistic heaven and earth than are dreamed of in the classical lore, which distinguishes just restrictive relative clauses and appositives. We start with degree relatives. Degree, or amount, relatives show restrictions in the relativizers they allow, in the determiners that can combine with them, and in their stacking possibilities. To account for these facts, we propose an analysis with two central, and novel, features: First, we argue that the standard notion of degree (a number on a measuring scale) needs to be replaced by a notion of structured degree, which keeps track of the object measured. Second, we argue that at the CP-level of degree relatives an operation of (degree) maximalization takes place. We show that the observed facts concerning degree relatives follow from these assumptions. We then broaden the discussion to other relative clause constructions. We propose that the operation of maximalization takes place in relative clauses when the head noun is semantically interpreted CP-internally, while syntactically the CP is part of a DP that also contains CP-external material. Based on this, we argue that degree relatives form part of a linguistically coherent class of relative clause constructions -- we call them maximalizing relatives -- which all show restrictions similar to those observed for degree relatives, and which differ semantically (and often also syntactically) both from restrictive relative clauses and from appositives. We discuss free relatives, internally-headed relatives, and correlatives.
REFERENCES
Bartsch, Renate: 1973, 'The Semantics and Syntax of Number and Numbers', in J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 51-93.
Basilico, David: 1996, 'Head Position and Internally-Headed Relatives', Language 72, 498-894.
Bianchi, Valentina: 1995, Consequences of Antisymmetry for the Syntax of Headed Relative Clauses, PhD. dissertation, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.
Bittner, Maria: 1994, 'Cross-linguistic Semantics', Linguistics and Philosophy 17(1), 53-108.
Bowers, John: 1991, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Nominals', in S. Moore and A. Wyner (eds.), Proceedings from SALT 1, Cornell University, Ithaca, pp. 1-30.
Bresnan, Joan and Jane Grimshaw: 1978, 'The Syntax of Free Relatives in English', Linguistic Inquiry 9(3), 331-391.
Carlson, Greg: 1977a, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published by Garland, New York.
Carlson, Greg: 1977b, 'Amount Relatives', Language 53, 520-542.
Chomsky, Noam: 1977, 'On Wh-movement', in P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71-132.
Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon: 1994, 'Is There LF-movement?' Linguistic Inquiry 25(2), 239-262.
Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav: 1991a, Wh Dependencies in Hindi and the Theory of Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav: 1991b, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives', Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 9, 637-686.
Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav: 1995, 'Quantification in Correlatives', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.) Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Dayal, Veneeta Srivastav: 1996, Locality in Wh Quantification, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Evans, Gareth: 1980, 'Pronouns', Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337-362.
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1982, 'Semantic Analysis of Wh-Complements', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 175-223.
Groos, Anneke and Henk van Riemsdijk: 1981, 'Matching Effects in Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar' in A. Belletti, L. Brandi and L. Rizzi (eds), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.
Grosu, Alexander: 1989, 'Pied-Piping and the Matching Parameter', The Linguistic Review 6(1), 41-58.
Grosu, Alexander: 1994, Three Studies in Locality and Case, Routledge, London.
Grosu, Alexander: 1996, 'The Proper Analysis of “Missing-P” Free Relative Constructions; A Reply to Larson', Linguistic Inquiry 27(2), 257-293.
Grosu, Alexander and Fred Landman: 1996, 'Carlson's Last Puzzle: Will It Go the Way of Fermat's Last Theorem?' in Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference and the Workshop on Discourse, Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, pp. 129-142.
Harbert, Wayne: 1983, 'On the Nature of the Matching Parameter', The Linguistic Review 2(3), 237-284.
Harbert, Wayne: 1992, 'Gothic Relative Clauses and Syntactic Theory', in I. Rauch, G. Carr and R. Kyes (eds.), On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 109-146.
Heim, Irene: 1987, 'Where Does the Definiteness Restriction Apply? Evidence from the Definiteness of Variables', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (in)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 21-42.
Hirschbuhler, Paul and Maria Rivero: 1981, 'Catalan Restrictive Relatives: Core and Periphery', Language 57(3), 591-625.
Hirschbuhler, Paul and Maria Rivero: 1983, 'Remarks on Free Relatives and Matching Phenomena', Linguistic Inquiry 14(3), 505-520.
Hoeksema, Jack: 1983, 'Negative Polarity and the Comparative', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 403-434.
Jacobson, Pauline: 1988, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Free Relatives in English,' paper presented at the LSA Winter Meeting, New Orleans.
Jacobson, Pauline: 1995, 'On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 451-486.
Kadmon, Nirit: 1987, On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published by Garland, New York.
Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Lanman: 1994, 'Any', Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4), 352-422.
Kayne, Richard: 1994, The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Landman, Fred: 1997, 'Parallels between the Nominal Domain and the Verbal Domain: The Case of Definitness Effects', manuscript, Tel Aviv University.
Landman, Fred: to appear, 'Plurals and Maximalization', in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Larson, Richard: 1987, '“Missing Prepositions” and the Analysis of English Free Relative Clauses', Linguistics Inquiry 18(2), 239-266.
Link, Godehard: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretic Approach', in R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 303-323.
McCawley, James: 1994, 'Remarks on Adsentential, Adnominal and Extraposed Relative Clauses in Hindi', paper presented at SALA 14, Stanford University.
Milsark, Gary: 1974, Existential Sentences in English, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Partee, Barbara: 1973, 'Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar', Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 509-534. Reprinted in B. Partee (ed.), 1976, Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York, pp. 51-76.
Partee, Barbara: 1987, 'Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type Shifting Principles', in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh and M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, GRASS 8, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115-143.
Rothstein, Susan: 1995, 'Adverbial Quantification over Events', Natural Language Semantics 3, 1-32.
Rullmann, Hotze: 1995, Maximality in the Semantics of Wh Constructions, Ph.D. dissertation, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Sells, Peter: 1985, 'Restrictive and Non-Restrictive Modification', Report #CSLI-85-28, Stanford University.
von Stechow, Arnim: 1984, 'Comparing Semantic Theories of Comparison', Journal of Semantics 1, 1-77.
Suñer, Marguerita: 1984, 'Free Relatives and the Matching Parameter', The Linguistic Review 3(4), 363-387.
Williamson, Janis: 1987, 'An Indefiniteness Restriction for Relative Clauses in Lakhota', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 168-190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grosu, A., Landman, F. Strange Relatives of the Third Kind. Natural Language Semantics 6, 125–170 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008268401837
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008268401837